1 resultado para Scientific publishing
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (3)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (22)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (32)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (32)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (34)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (20)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (12)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (21)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (155)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (12)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (11)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (334)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (31)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (2)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (5)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (27)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
This paper argues that the best way to achieve major improvements in scholarly communication in the short and medium term is to make it mandatory to deposit research papers in open access institutional repositories. This is what the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report of 2004 on scientific publishing recommended. The paper defines what open access repositories are and explains why they should be institutional. It also deals with question of what should be deposited in institutional repositories and why these improve scholarly communication. It then deals with the issue of mandating deposition: why deposition should be mandatory, who should mandate deposition and who should carry out deposition. The paper concludes with an analysis of the wider implications of mandating deposition in institutional repositories and a summary of the existing situation in the UK and elsewhere. The paper discusses the Select Committee report and the UK Government response in relation to institutional repositories.