On the comparison of proof planning systems: Lambda-clam, Omega and IsaPlanner

We present a framework for describing proof planners. This framework is based around a decomposition of proof planners into planning states, proof language, proof plans, proof methods, proof revision, proof control and planning algorithms. We use this framework to motivate the comparison of three recent proof planning systems, lclam, OMEGA and IsaPlanner, and demonstrate how the framework allows us to discuss and illustrate both their similarities and differences in a consistent fashion. This analysis reveals that proof control and the use of contextual information in planning states are key areas in need of further investigation.

Chaotic mixing of a competitive-consecutive reaction

The evolution of a competitive-consecutive chemical reaction is computed numerically in a two-dimensional chaotic fluid flow with initially segregated reactants. Results from numerical simulations are used to evaluate a variety of reduced models commonly adopted to model the full advection-reaction-diffusion problem. Particular emphasis is placed upon fast reactions, where the yield varies most significantly with Peclet number (the ratio of diffusive to advective time scales). When effects of the fluid mechanical mixing are strongest, we find that the yield of the reaction is underestimated by a one-dimensional lamellar model that ignores the effects of fluid mixing, but overestimated by two other lamellar models that include fluid mixing.