1 resultado para Party walls.
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (154)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (21)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (7)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (33)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (6)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (47)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (39)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (13)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (4)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (6)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (40)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (24)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (7)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (40)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (114)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (101)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (15)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (8)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (160)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (11)
Resumo:
The inclusion of non-ipsative measures of party preference (in essence ratings for each of the parties of a political system) has become established practice in mass surveys conducted for election studies. They exist in different forms, known as thermometer ratings or feeling scores, likes and dislikes scores, or support propensities. Usually only one of these is included in a single survey, which makes it difficult to assess the relative merits of each. The questionnaire of the Irish National Election Study 2002 (INES2002) contained three different batteries of non-ipsative party preferences. This paper investigates some of the properties of these different indicators. We focus in particular on two phenomena. First, the relationship between non-ipsative preferences and the choices actually made on the ballot. In Ireland this relationship is more revealing than in most other countries owing to the electoral system (STV) which allows voters to cast multiple ordered votes for candidates from different parties. Second, we investigate the latent structure of each of the batteries of party preferences and the relationships between them. We conclude that the three instruments are not interchangeable, that they measure different orientations, and that one –the propensity to vote for a party– is by far preferable if the purpose of the study is the explanation of voters’ actual choice behaviour. This finding has important ramifications for the design of election study questionnaires.