1 resultado para Omega
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (82)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (7)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (7)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (44)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (201)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (7)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (178)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (50)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (25)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (38)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (17)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (18)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (14)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (12)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
We present a framework for describing proof planners. This framework is based around a decomposition of proof planners into planning states, proof language, proof plans, proof methods, proof revision, proof control and planning algorithms. We use this framework to motivate the comparison of three recent proof planning systems, lclam, OMEGA and IsaPlanner, and demonstrate how the framework allows us to discuss and illustrate both their similarities and differences in a consistent fashion. This analysis reveals that proof control and the use of contextual information in planning states are key areas in need of further investigation.