1 resultado para Non-Piston-Like Displacement
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (27)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (27)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (13)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (31)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (16)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (29)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (18)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (24)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (9)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (9)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (54)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (9)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (49)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (378)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (63)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (22)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (3)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (10)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
The inclusion of non-ipsative measures of party preference (in essence ratings for each of the parties of a political system) has become established practice in mass surveys conducted for election studies. They exist in different forms, known as thermometer ratings or feeling scores, likes and dislikes scores, or support propensities. Usually only one of these is included in a single survey, which makes it difficult to assess the relative merits of each. The questionnaire of the Irish National Election Study 2002 (INES2002) contained three different batteries of non-ipsative party preferences. This paper investigates some of the properties of these different indicators. We focus in particular on two phenomena. First, the relationship between non-ipsative preferences and the choices actually made on the ballot. In Ireland this relationship is more revealing than in most other countries owing to the electoral system (STV) which allows voters to cast multiple ordered votes for candidates from different parties. Second, we investigate the latent structure of each of the batteries of party preferences and the relationships between them. We conclude that the three instruments are not interchangeable, that they measure different orientations, and that one –the propensity to vote for a party– is by far preferable if the purpose of the study is the explanation of voters’ actual choice behaviour. This finding has important ramifications for the design of election study questionnaires.