1 resultado para D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (38)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (19)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archive of European Integration (11)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (13)
- Aston University Research Archive (43)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (6)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (16)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (12)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (74)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (5)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (18)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (4)
- Duke University (6)
- Düsseldorfer Dokumenten- und Publikationsservice (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (27)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (6)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (15)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (13)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (31)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (100)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (34)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (27)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (10)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (29)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (14)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (5)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (5)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (11)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (3)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (21)
- University of Connecticut - USA (7)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
Recent health policy in England has demanded greater involvement of patients and the public in the commissioning of health and social care services. Public involvement is seen as a means of driving up service quality, reducing health inequalities and achieving value in commissioning decisions. This paper presents a summary and analysis of the forms that public involvement in commissioning are to take, along with empirical analysis from a qualitative study of service-user involvement. It is argued that the diversity of constituencies covered by the notion of ‘public involvement’, and the breadth of aims that public involvement is expected to achieve, require careful disaggregation. Public involvement in commissioning may encompass a variety of interest groups, whose inputs may include population needs assessment, evaluation of service quality, advocacy of the interests of a particular patient group or service, or a combination of all of these. Each of these roles may be legitimate, but there are significant tensions between them. The extent to which the structures for public involvement proposed recognize these possible tensions is arguably limited. Notably, new Local Involvement Networks (LINks), which will feed into commissioning decisions, are set as the arbiters of these different interests, a demanding role which will require considerable skill, tenacity and robustness if it is to be fulfilled effectively.