1 resultado para Content-sensitive services
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (20)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (9)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (21)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (8)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (46)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Peer Publishing (5)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (12)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (9)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (682)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (13)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (10)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The referral letter is a key instrument in moving patients from primary to secondary care services. Consequently, the circumstances in which a referral should be made and its contents have been the subject of clinical guidelines. This article is based on a project that demonstrated that physicians do not adhere to clinical guidelines when referring patients to secondary mental health services. This research supports earlier findings into noncompliance with guidelines by general practitioners (GPs). The authors briefly note possible reasons, which have been the subject of some debate. They also present a content analysis of referral letters to demonstrate the important ways in which they differ from guideline criteria. However, their central argument is that the role of the referral letter in relation to the GP’s repertoire of treatments has not been understood fully. Such understanding implies the need for a reexamination of the support available for GPs.