1 resultado para Choice of Law
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (7)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- Archive of European Integration (27)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (10)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (2)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (55)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (40)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (6)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (81)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- Duke University (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Harvard University (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (12)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (65)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (320)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (17)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (19)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (125)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (22)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (12)
Resumo:
Electoral researchers are so much accustomed to analyzing the choice of the single most preferred party as the left-hand side variable of their models of electoral behavior that they often ignore revealed preference data. Drawing on random utility theory, their models predict electoral behavior at the extensive margin of choice. Since the seminal work of Luce and others on individual choice behavior, however, many social science disciplines (consumer research, labor market research, travel demand, etc.) have extended their inventory of observed preference data with, for instance, multiple paired comparisons, complete or incomplete rankings, and multiple ratings. Eliciting (voter) preferences using these procedures and applying appropriate choice models is known to considerably increase the efficiency of estimates of causal factors in models of (electoral) behavior. In this paper, we demonstrate the efficiency gain when adding additional preference information to first preferences, up to full ranking data. We do so for multi-party systems of different sizes. We use simulation studies as well as empirical data from the 1972 German election study. Comparing the practical considerations for using ranking and single preference data results in suggestions for choice of measurement instruments in different multi-candidate and multi-party settings.