1 resultado para Bureaucratic itineraries
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (4)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (9)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (22)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (27)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (40)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (9)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (46)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (24)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (41)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (6)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (55)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (12)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (56)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (14)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (16)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (6)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (42)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (32)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (6)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
The paper explores the attitudes of medical physicians towards adverse incident reporting in health care, with particular focus on the inhibiting factors or barriers to participation. It is recognised that there are major barriers to medical reporting, such as the ‘culture of blame’. There are, however, few detailed qualitative accounts of medical culture as it relates to incident reporting. Drawing on a 2-year qualitative case study in the UK, this paper presents data gathered from 28 semi-structured interviews with specialist physicians. The findings suggest that blame certainly inhibits medical reporting, but other cultural issues were also significant. It was commonly accepted by doctors that errors are an ‘inevitable’ and potentially unmanageable feature of medical work and incident reporting was therefore ‘pointless’. It was also found that reporting was discouraged by an anti-bureaucratic sentiment and rejection of excessive administrative duties. Doctors were also apprehensive about the increased potential for managers and non-physicians to engage in the regulation of medical quality through the use of incident data. The paper argues that the promotion of incident reporting must engage with more than the ubiquitous ‘culture of blame’ and instead address the ‘culture of medicine’, especially as it relates to the collegial and professional control of quality.