Integrating structured data using property precedence

Data integration systems offer uniform access to a set of autonomous and heterogeneous data sources. One of the main challenges in data integration is reconciling semantic differences among data sources. Approaches that been used to solve this problem can be categorized as schema-based and attribute-based. Schema-based approaches use schema information to identify the semantic similarity in data; furthermore, they focus on reconciling types before reconciling attributes. In contrast, attribute-based approaches use statistical and structural information of attributes to identify the semantic similarity of data in different sources. This research examines an approach to semantic reconciliation based on integrating properties expressed at different levels of abstraction or granularity using the concept of property precedence. Property precedence reconciles the meaning of attributes by identifying similarities between attributes based on what these attributes represent in the real world. In order to use property precedence for semantic integration, we need to identify the precedence of attributes within and across data sources. The goal of this research is to develop and evaluate a method and algorithms that will identify precedence relations among attributes and build property precedence graph (PPG) that can be used to support integration.

Perceptions of Social Supports and Services for Intimate Partner Violence Victims

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a complex issue. The present study explored how media exposure to female and male victims of IPV affected participants’ support for both groups. It was hypothesized that female victims would be supported more than male victims and that presenting stimuli that drew attention to male victims would not decrease support for female victims. Participants were presented with one of three posters, drawing attention to male victims, female victims, or both. A questionnaire was then used to assess perceptions of support for IPV victims, which was completed by 121 participants. Results indicated that females were supported more than males and that drawing attention to male victims did not decrease participants’ support for female victims. An exploratory analysis also revealed that women, overall, have high support for all victims, while men’s level of support changed depending on the type of information to which they were exposed.

Structured decision making as a tool for facilitating stakeholder engagement in non-renewable resource management: using the case study of hydraulic fracturing in the Green Point Shale formation in western Newfoundland

This thesis examines the importance of effective stakeholder engagement that complies with the doctrines of social justice in non-renewable resources management decision-making. It uses hydraulic fracturing in the Green Point Shale Formation in Western Newfoundland as a case study. The thesis uses as theoretical background John Rawls’ and David Miller’ theory of social justice, and identifies the social justice principles, which are relevant to stakeholder engagement. The thesis compares the method of stakeholder engagement employed by the Newfoundland and Labrador Hydraulic Fracturing Review Panel (NLHFRP), with the stakeholder engagement techniques recommended by the Structured Decision Making (SDM) model, as applied to a simulated case study involving hydraulic fracturing in the Green Point Shale Formation. Using the already identified social justice principles, the thesis then developed a framework to measure the level of compliance of both stakeholder engagement techniques with social justice principles. The main finding of the thesis is that the engagement techniques prescribed by the SDM model comply more closely with the doctrines of social justice than the engagement techniques applied by the NLHFRP. The thesis concludes by recommending that the SDM model be more widely used in non- renewable resource management decision making in order to ensure that all stakeholders’ concerns are effectively heard, understood and transparently incorporated in the nonrenewable resource policies to make them consistent with local priorities and goals, and with the social justice norms and institutions.