1 resultado para Small-sample Properties
em Memorial University Research Repository
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (17)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (25)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (86)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (4)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (38)
- Brock University, Canada (21)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (76)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (31)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (64)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (33)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (24)
- Duke University (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (5)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (22)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (7)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (13)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (3)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (42)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (11)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (58)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (10)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (4)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade do Minho (18)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (81)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (26)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (52)
- University of Washington (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Background: An evaluation was completed on the One-Day Meditech Magic Training Program for Registered Nurses (RNs) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) developed for the Long Term Care (LTC) Program. Methods: Both a literature review and consultation with stakeholders were completed to determine possible evaluation methods, expected outcomes, and ways to measure the effectiveness of the education program. A pretest/posttest design and questionnaire were chosen as the evaluation tools for this project. Results: No significant difference was found between the pretest and posttest total scores indicating that learners retained information from the orientation session (Z = -1.820, p = 0.069). Additional Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests were performed on the individual sections of the tests and revealed a significant decrease in the posttest scores for entering a Diagnostic Imaging requisition (Z = -1.975, p = 0.048). No other significant findings were present. Questionnaires were also analyzed revealing that most participants were pleased with the Meditech documentation education they received and did not indicate barriers that would affect electronic documentation. Conclusions: Further testing is required to ensure reliability and validity of the evaluation tools. Finally, caution is needed due to a small sample size. However, problematic documentation tasks were identified during the evaluation, and as a result both the training session and support materials will be improved as a result of this project.