1 resultado para Process of Learning or Change
em Memorial University Research Repository
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (31)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (47)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (17)
- Brock University, Canada (18)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (85)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (7)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (24)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (38)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (10)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (13)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (42)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (14)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (3)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Open University Netherlands (4)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (5)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (90)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (25)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (46)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (3)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (12)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade do Minho (5)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (69)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (11)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (38)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Maternity nursing practice is changing across Canada with the movement toward becoming “baby friendly.” The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) as a standard of care in hospitals worldwide. Very little research has been conducted with nurses to explore the impact of the initiative on nursing practice. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the process of implementing the BFHI for nurses. The study was carried out using Corbin and Strauss’s method of grounded theory. Theoretical sampling was employed, which resulted in recruiting and interviewing 13 registered nurses whose area of employment included neonatal intensive care, postpartum, and labour and delivery. The data analysis revealed a central category of resisting the BFHI. All of the nurses disagreed with some of the 10 steps to becoming a baby-friendly hospital as outlined by the WHO. Participants questioned the science and safety of aspects of the BFHI. Also, participants indicated that the implementation of this program did not substantially change their nursing practice. They empathized with new mothers and anticipated being collectively reprimanded by management should they not follow the initiative. Five conditions influenced their responses to the initiative, which were (a) an awareness of a pro-breastfeeding culture, (b) imposition of the BFHI, (c) knowledge of the health benefits of breastfeeding, (d) experiential knowledge of infant feeding, and (e) the belief in the autonomy of mothers to decide about infant feeding. The identified outcomes were moral distress and division between nurses. The study findings could guide decision making concerning the implementation of the BFHI.