1 resultado para Mothers and daughters
em Memorial University Research Repository
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (12)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (47)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (3)
- Bioline International (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (28)
- Brock University, Canada (18)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (48)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (13)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (20)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (17)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (16)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (8)
- Duke University (3)
- Harvard University (8)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (8)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (9)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (4)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (8)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (10)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (5)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (2)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (114)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (9)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (53)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidade do Minho (22)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (11)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (22)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (6)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universita di Parma (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (43)
- Université de Montréal (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (31)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (54)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (65)
- University of Washington (1)
- USA Library of Congress (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Maternity nursing practice is changing across Canada with the movement toward becoming “baby friendly.” The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) as a standard of care in hospitals worldwide. Very little research has been conducted with nurses to explore the impact of the initiative on nursing practice. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the process of implementing the BFHI for nurses. The study was carried out using Corbin and Strauss’s method of grounded theory. Theoretical sampling was employed, which resulted in recruiting and interviewing 13 registered nurses whose area of employment included neonatal intensive care, postpartum, and labour and delivery. The data analysis revealed a central category of resisting the BFHI. All of the nurses disagreed with some of the 10 steps to becoming a baby-friendly hospital as outlined by the WHO. Participants questioned the science and safety of aspects of the BFHI. Also, participants indicated that the implementation of this program did not substantially change their nursing practice. They empathized with new mothers and anticipated being collectively reprimanded by management should they not follow the initiative. Five conditions influenced their responses to the initiative, which were (a) an awareness of a pro-breastfeeding culture, (b) imposition of the BFHI, (c) knowledge of the health benefits of breastfeeding, (d) experiential knowledge of infant feeding, and (e) the belief in the autonomy of mothers to decide about infant feeding. The identified outcomes were moral distress and division between nurses. The study findings could guide decision making concerning the implementation of the BFHI.