1 resultado para Magic, Assyro-Babylonian.
em Memorial University Research Repository
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (12)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (18)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (15)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (44)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (18)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (22)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (6)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (14)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (2)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Livre Saber - Repositório Digital de Materiais Didáticos - SEaD-UFSCar (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (4)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (21)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (17)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (8)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (22)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (67)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (7)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (16)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (11)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (10)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (30)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (40)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (15)
- University of Michigan (135)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (24)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (7)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Background: An evaluation was completed on the One-Day Meditech Magic Training Program for Registered Nurses (RNs) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) developed for the Long Term Care (LTC) Program. Methods: Both a literature review and consultation with stakeholders were completed to determine possible evaluation methods, expected outcomes, and ways to measure the effectiveness of the education program. A pretest/posttest design and questionnaire were chosen as the evaluation tools for this project. Results: No significant difference was found between the pretest and posttest total scores indicating that learners retained information from the orientation session (Z = -1.820, p = 0.069). Additional Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests were performed on the individual sections of the tests and revealed a significant decrease in the posttest scores for entering a Diagnostic Imaging requisition (Z = -1.975, p = 0.048). No other significant findings were present. Questionnaires were also analyzed revealing that most participants were pleased with the Meditech documentation education they received and did not indicate barriers that would affect electronic documentation. Conclusions: Further testing is required to ensure reliability and validity of the evaluation tools. Finally, caution is needed due to a small sample size. However, problematic documentation tasks were identified during the evaluation, and as a result both the training session and support materials will be improved as a result of this project.