1 resultado para Friendly societies.
em Memorial University Research Repository
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (4)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (13)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (53)
- Boston University Digital Common (6)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (6)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (10)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (15)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Ecology and Society (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (11)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (7)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (5)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (82)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (289)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (3)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (14)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (8)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (201)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (12)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Maternity nursing practice is changing across Canada with the movement toward becoming “baby friendly.” The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) as a standard of care in hospitals worldwide. Very little research has been conducted with nurses to explore the impact of the initiative on nursing practice. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the process of implementing the BFHI for nurses. The study was carried out using Corbin and Strauss’s method of grounded theory. Theoretical sampling was employed, which resulted in recruiting and interviewing 13 registered nurses whose area of employment included neonatal intensive care, postpartum, and labour and delivery. The data analysis revealed a central category of resisting the BFHI. All of the nurses disagreed with some of the 10 steps to becoming a baby-friendly hospital as outlined by the WHO. Participants questioned the science and safety of aspects of the BFHI. Also, participants indicated that the implementation of this program did not substantially change their nursing practice. They empathized with new mothers and anticipated being collectively reprimanded by management should they not follow the initiative. Five conditions influenced their responses to the initiative, which were (a) an awareness of a pro-breastfeeding culture, (b) imposition of the BFHI, (c) knowledge of the health benefits of breastfeeding, (d) experiential knowledge of infant feeding, and (e) the belief in the autonomy of mothers to decide about infant feeding. The identified outcomes were moral distress and division between nurses. The study findings could guide decision making concerning the implementation of the BFHI.