1 resultado para Baby-boom
em Memorial University Research Repository
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (25)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (14)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad del Valle - Colombia (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (23)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (40)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (11)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (36)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (16)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (9)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (26)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (9)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (109)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (6)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (13)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (19)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (14)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (42)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (7)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (74)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (142)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (5)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (8)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RU-FFYL. Repositorio de la Facultad de Filosofiía y Letras. UNAM. - Mexico (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (8)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (40)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (36)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (61)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Maternity nursing practice is changing across Canada with the movement toward becoming “baby friendly.” The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) as a standard of care in hospitals worldwide. Very little research has been conducted with nurses to explore the impact of the initiative on nursing practice. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the process of implementing the BFHI for nurses. The study was carried out using Corbin and Strauss’s method of grounded theory. Theoretical sampling was employed, which resulted in recruiting and interviewing 13 registered nurses whose area of employment included neonatal intensive care, postpartum, and labour and delivery. The data analysis revealed a central category of resisting the BFHI. All of the nurses disagreed with some of the 10 steps to becoming a baby-friendly hospital as outlined by the WHO. Participants questioned the science and safety of aspects of the BFHI. Also, participants indicated that the implementation of this program did not substantially change their nursing practice. They empathized with new mothers and anticipated being collectively reprimanded by management should they not follow the initiative. Five conditions influenced their responses to the initiative, which were (a) an awareness of a pro-breastfeeding culture, (b) imposition of the BFHI, (c) knowledge of the health benefits of breastfeeding, (d) experiential knowledge of infant feeding, and (e) the belief in the autonomy of mothers to decide about infant feeding. The identified outcomes were moral distress and division between nurses. The study findings could guide decision making concerning the implementation of the BFHI.