1 resultado para Anodic breakdown
em Memorial University Research Repository
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (14)
- Archive of European Integration (19)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (7)
- Aston University Research Archive (12)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (11)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (18)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (12)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (69)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (215)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (15)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (15)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (10)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (12)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (20)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (181)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (16)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (11)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (100)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (92)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (7)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (27)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Leaf bags of fine and coarse mesh were placed at two locations, one with an open tree canopy, the other with a closed tree canopy, in Pynn’s Brook on June 30th 2015. Bags were collected after 2, 30, 37 and 44 days. After collection, invertebrates were counted and leaf material remaining was determined to measure leaf breakdown rate. There was no significant difference in leaf mass remaining (R) between the two sites. Comparisons between mesh types found a difference in leaf breakdown at two collection days. The difference at 2 days was small (2.7%) and may not be biologically meaningful. At 37 days, the difference was larger (8.41%) and may be related to a larger proportion of shredder taxa, seen in coarse mesh bags, or higher absolute numbers of invertebrates. The invertebrate community was dominated by Diptera spp. across all collection days and mesh types, but after 37 days, communities in coarse mesh bags had a higher proportion of shredder orders than did fine mesh bags.