Aromatic amines sources, environmental impact and remediation

Aromatic amines are widely used industrial chemicals as their major sources in the environment include several chemical industry sectors such as oil refining, synthetic polymers, dyes, adhesives, rubbers, perfume, pharmaceuticals, pesticides and explosives. They result also from diesel exhaust, combustion of wood chips and rubber and tobacco smoke. Some types of aromatic amines are generated during cooking, special grilled meat and fish, as well. The intensive use and production of these compounds explains its occurrence in the environment such as in air, water and soil, thereby creating a potential for human exposure. Since aromatic amines are potential carcinogenic and toxic agents, they constitute an important class of environmental pollutants of enormous concern, which efficient removal is a crucial task for researchers, so several methods have been investigated and applied. In this chapter the types and general properties of aromatic amine compounds are reviewed. As aromatic amines are continuously entering the environment from various sources and have been designated as high priority pollutants, their presence in the environment must be monitored at concentration levels lower than 30 mg L1, compatible with the limits allowed by the regulations. Consequently, most relevant analytical methods to detect the aromatic amines composition in environmental matrices, and for monitoring their degradation, are essential and will be presented. Those include Spectroscopy, namely UV/visible and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR); Chromatography, in particular Thin Layer (TLC), High Performance Liquid (HPLC) and Gas chromatography (GC); Capillary electrophoresis (CE); Mass spectrometry (MS) and combination of different methods including GC-MS, HPLC-MS and CE-MS. Choosing the best methods depend on their availability, costs, detection limit and sample concentration, which sometimes need to be concentrate or pretreated. However, combined methods may give more complete results based on the complementary information. The environmental impact, toxicity and carcinogenicity of many aromatic amines have been reported and are emphasized in this chapter too. Lately, the conventional aromatic amines degradation and the alternative biodegradation processes are highlighted. Parameters affecting biodegradation, role of different electron acceptors in aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation and kinetics are discussed. Conventional processes including extraction, adsorption onto activated carbon, chemical oxidation, advanced oxidation, electrochemical techniques and irradiation suffer from drawbacks including high costs, formation of hazardous by-products and low efficiency. Biological processes, taking advantage of the naturally processes occurring in environment, have been developed and tested, proved as an economic, energy efficient and environmentally feasible alternative. Aerobic biodegradation is one of the most promising techniques for aromatic amines remediation, but has the drawback of aromatic amines autooxidation once they are exposed to oxygen, instead of their degradation. Higher costs, especially due to power consumption for aeration, can also limit its application. Anaerobic degradation technology is the novel path for treatment of a wide variety of aromatic amines, including industrial wastewater, and will be discussed. However, some are difficult to degrade under anaerobic conditions and, thus, other electron acceptors such as nitrate, iron, sulphate, manganese and carbonate have, alternatively, been tested.

Acellular Gellan-gum based bilayered structures for the regeneration of osteochondral defects: a preclinical study

 In orthopaedics, the management and treatment of osteochondral (OC) defects remains an ongoing clinical challenge. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty has been used as a valid option for OC treatments although donor site morbidity remains a source of concern [1]. Engineering a whole structure capable of mimicking different tissues (cartilage and subchondral bone) in an integrated manner could be a possible approach to regenerate OC defects. In our group we have been proposing the use of bilayered structures to regenerate osteochondral defects [2,3]. The present study aims to investigate the pre-clinical performance of bilayered hydrogels and spongy-like hydrogels in in vivo  models (mice and rabbit, respectively), in both subcutaneous and orthotopic models. The bilayered structures were produced from Low Acyl Gellan Gum (LAGG) from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Cartilage-like layers were obtained from a 2wt% LAGG solution. The bone-like layers were made of 2wt% LAGG with incorporation of hydroxyapatite at 20% and 30% (w/v). Hydrogels and spongy-like were subcutaneouly implanted in mice to evaluate the inflammatory response. Then, OC defects were induced in rabbit knee to create a critical size defect (4 mm diameter and 5 mm depth), and then hydrogels and sponges implanted. Both structures followed different processing methods. The hydrogels were injected allowing in situ  crosslinking. Unlike, the spongy-like were pre-formed by freeze-drying. The studies concerning subcutaneous implantation and critical size OC defect were performed for 2 and 4 weeks time, respectively. Cellular behavior and inflammatory responses were assessed by means of histology staining and biochemical function and matrix deposition by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, both OC structures stability and new cartilage and bone formation were evaluated by using vivo- computed tomography (Scanco 80). The results showed no acute inflammatory response for both approaches. New tissue formation and integration in the adjacent tissues were also observed, which present different characteristic behaviors when comparing hydrogels and sponges response. As future insights, a novel strategy for regeneration of OC defects can be designed encompassing both, hydrogels and spongy-like structures and cellular approaches. References: 1. Espregueira-Mendes J. et al. Osteochondral transplantation using autografts from the upper tibio-fibular joint for the treatment of knee cartilage lesions. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 20,1136, 2012. 2. Oliveira JM. et al, Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: Scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 27, 6123, 2006. 3. Pereira D R. et al. Gellan Gum-Based Hydrogel Bilayered Scaffolds for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering. Key Engineering Materials 587, 255, 2013.

Development of polymeric nanoparticles containing neuroprotective compounds of Hypericum perforatum

Tese de Doutoramento em Biologia das Plantas - MAP BIOPLANT