1 resultado para Geographical digital library
em Universidade do Minho
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (164)
- Aston University Research Archive (10)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (11)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (12)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (12)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (33)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (10)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (5)
- Claremont University Consortium, United States (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (24)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (16)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (13)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (20)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (50)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (6)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (14)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (60)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (6)
- E-Research at Tennessee State University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (67)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (15)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (3)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (3)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (30)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (7)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (8)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade do Minho (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (8)
- University of Michigan (126)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (75)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (7)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
Forming suitable learning groups is one of the factors that determine the efficiency of collaborative learning activities. However, only a few studies were carried out to address this problem in the mobile learning environments. In this paper, we propose a new approach for an automatic, customized, and dynamic group formation in Mobile Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (MCSCL) contexts. The proposed solution is based on the combination of three types of grouping criteria: learner’s personal characteristics, learner’s behaviours, and context information. The instructors can freely select the type, the number, and the weight of grouping criteria, together with other settings such as the number, the size, and the type of learning groups (homogeneous or heterogeneous). Apart from a grouping mechanism, the proposed approach represents a flexible tool to control each learner, and to manage the learning processes from the beginning to the end of collaborative learning activities. In order to evaluate the quality of the implemented group formation algorithm, we compare its Average Intra-cluster Distance (AID) with the one of a random group formation method. The results show a higher effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in forming homogenous and heterogeneous groups compared to the random method.