Mutation analysis of TGF-β signaling pathway genes among Finnish patients with primary pulmonary hypertension and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), or according to the recent classification idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (IPAH), is a rare, progressive disease of pulmonary vasculature leading to pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure. Most of the patients are sporadic but in about 6% of cases the disease is familial (FPPH). In 2000 two different groups identified the gene predisposing to PPH. This gene, Bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2), encodes a subunit of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) receptor complex. There is a genetic connection between PPH and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), a bleeding disorder characterized by local telangiectasias and sometimes with pulmonary hypertension. In HHT, mutations in ALK1 (activin like kinase type 1) and Endoglin, another members of the TGF-β signaling pathway are found. In this study we identified all of the Finnish PPH patients for the years 1986-1999 using the hospital discharge registries of Finnish university hospitals. During this period we found a total of 59 confirmed PPH patients: 55 sporadic and 4 familial representing 3 different families. In 1999 the prevalence of PPH was 5.8 per million and the annual incidence varied between 0.2-1.3 per million. Among 28 PPH patients studied, heterozygous BMPR2 mutations were found in 12% (3/26) of sporadic patients and in 33% of the PPH families (1/3). All the mutations found were different. Large deletions of BMPR2 were excluded by single-stranded chain polymomorphism analysis. As a candidate gene approach we also studied ALK1, Endoglin, Bone Morphogenetic Receptor Type IA (BMPR1A or ALK3), Mothers Against Decapentaplegic Homolog 4 (SMAD4) and Serotonine Transporter Gene (SLC6A4) using single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and direct sequencing. Among patients and family members studied, we found two mutations in ALK1 in two unrelated samples. We also identified all the HHT patients treated at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Helsinki University Central Hospital between the years of 1990-2005 and 8 of the patients were studied for Endoglin and ALK1 mutations using direct sequencing. A total of seven mutations were found and all the mutations were different. The absence of a founder mutation in the Finnish population in both PPH and HHT was somewhat surprising. This suggests that the mutations of BMPR2, ALK1 and Endoglin are quite young and the older mutations have been lost due to repetitive genetic bottlenecks and/or negative selection. Also, other genes than BMPR2 may be involved in the pathogenesis of PPH. No founder mutations were found in PPH or HHT and thus no simple genetic test is available for diagnostics.

ATM, RAD50 and p53 in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer among women, and its incidence is increasing worldwide. Positive family history is a well established risk factor for breast cancer, and it is suggested that the proportion of breast cancer that can be attributed to genetic factors may be as high as 30%. However, all the currently known breast cancer susceptibility genes are estimated to account for 20-30% of familial breast cancer, and only 5% of the total breast cancer incidence. It is thus likely that there are still other breast cancer susceptibility genes to be found. Cellular responses to DNA damage are crucial for maintaining genomic integrity and preventing the development of cancer. The genes operating in DNA damage response signaling network are thus good candidates for breast cancer susceptibility genes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of three DNA damage response associated genes, ATM, RAD50, and p53, in breast cancer. ATM, a gene causative for ataxia telangiectasia (A-T), has long been a strong candidate for a breast cancer susceptibility gene because of its function as a key DNA damage signal transducer. We analyzed the prevalence of known Finnish A-T related ATM mutations in large series of familial and unselected breast cancer cases from different geographical regions in Finland. Of the seven A-T related mutations, two were observed in the studied familial breast cancer patients. Additionally, a third mutation previously associated with breast cancer susceptibility was also detected. These founder mutations may be responsible for excess familial breast cancer regionally in Northern and Central Finland, but in Southern Finland our results suggest only a minor effect, if any, of any ATM genetic variants on familial breast cancer. We also screened the entire coding region of the ATM gene in 47 familial breast cancer patients from Southern Finland, and evaluated the identified variants in additional cases and controls. All the identified variants were too rare to significantly contribute to breast cancer susceptibility. However, the role of ATM in cancer development and progression was supported by the results of the immunohistochemical studies of ATM expression, as reduced ATM expression in breast carcinomas was found to correlate with tumor differentiation and hormone receptor status. Aberrant ATM expression was also a feature shared by the BRCA1/2 and the difficult-to-treat ER/PR/ERBB2-triple-negative breast carcinomas. From the clinical point of view, identification of phenotypic and genetic similarities between the BRCA1/2 and the triple-negative breast tumors could have an implication in designing novel targeted therapies to which both of these classes of breast cancer might be exceptionally sensitive. Mutations of another plausible breast cancer susceptibility gene, RAD50, were found to be very rare, and RAD50 can only be making a minor contribution to familial breast cancer predisposition in UK and Southern Finland. The Finnish founder mutation RAD50 687delT seems to be a null allele and may carry a small increased risk of breast cancer. RAD50 is not acting as a classical tumor suppressor gene, but it is possible that RAD50 haploinsufficiency is contributing to cancer. In addition to relatively rare breast cancer susceptibility alleles, common polymorphisms may also be associated with increased breast cancer risk. Furthermore, these polymorphisms may have an impact on the progression and outcome of the disease. Our results suggest no effect of the common p53 R72P polymorphism on familial breast cancer risk or breast cancer risk in the population, but R72P seems to be associated with histopathologic features of the tumors and survival of the patients; 72P homozygous genotype was an independent prognostic factor among the unselected breast cancer patients, with a two-fold increased risk of death. These results present important novel findings also with clinical significance, as codon 72 genotype could be a useful additional prognostic marker in breast cancer, especially among the subgroup of patients with wild-type p53 in their tumors.