Andegraund : Istorija i mify leningradskoj neoficial'noj literatury

The history of the Leningrad underground is one of the key themes of late socialism. Samizdat, "black humour", religious syncretism, dissidence, apolitical bohemianism, the pathos of freedom of individuality and the mechanics of literature are closely interlinked with the cultural mythology of this passed epoch. Describing conceptions that, when taken together, form the contemporary understanding of unofficial culture, the author creates a historical portrait of this environment. Amongst the central figures here, there are well-known writers (Bitov, Brodsky, Dovlatov, Khvostenko, Krivulin) and literary activists who still await recognition. The analysis of works, many of which were only distributed in typewritten publications in the 1960s-1980s, gives a preliminary definition of the key factors that united the authors of the unofficial community. The book begins with a critique of the identification of the Soviet underground with political dissidence or with a society living in autonomous independence with regard to the state. Describing the historical development of the various names for this environment (the underground, samizdat, unofficial culture, podpolie and others), the author follows the genesis of the community from its appearance, in the years of "the Thaw", through to perestroika, when it dissolved. Taking the history of the publication of Bitov's "The Pushkin House" as an example, the concept of the unofficial is interpreted as a risky interaction with the authorities. Unofficial culture is then viewed as a late Soviet reflection of the Western underground in the 1950s-1960s. Unlike the radical-utopian-anarchistic source, it proclaimed a liberalist and democratic ideology in the context of the destruction of the socialist utopia. The historical portrait of the community is built up from the perceptions of its members regarding literature practice and rhetorical approaches, with the aid of which these perceptions are expressed. Taking typewritten publications as source material, four main representations are given: privacy, deviancy, criticism and irrationality. An understanding of literature as a private affair, neo-avant-garde deviancy in social and literary behaviour and the pathos of the critical relationship with officialdom and irrational message of literary work, comprise the basis for the worldview of unofficial authors, as well as the poetic system, genre preferences and dictums. An analysis of irrationality, based on the texts of Khvostenko and Bogdanov, leads to a review of the cultural mythologies that were crucial to the unofficial conception of the absurd. Absurd is an homonym. It contains ideas that are important for the worldview of unofficial authors and the poetics of their works. The irrationality of the Soviet order is reflected in the documentary nature of the satirical prose of Dovlatov. The existential absurd of Camus is perceived here as the pointlessness of social realities and the ontological alienation of man, while existentialist practices for consciousness in the "atmosphere of absurd" remain bracketed off. The third homonym of absurd - the conception of reality as an illusion - is a clear demonstration of religious syncretism, where neo-Christian ideas are interweaved with a modernized version of Hinduism, as taken from Rolland s books on Ramakrishna and Vivekananda. The unofficial community was influenced by the ideology of westernization. Even "the East" arrived here via French retellings and accounts. As a whole, unofficial Leningrad culture can be understood as a neo-modernist phenomenon which, unlike the western neo-modernism of the 1940s and 1950s, arose in the years of the Thaw and ended its existence in the mid-1980s.

Nationalistinen retoriikka nyky-Puolassa - parlamenttivaalit 2005

Tutkielma käsittelee Puolassa syksyllä 2005 järjestettyjen parlamenttivaalien vaalikamppailua ja puolueiden käyttämää retoriikkaa. Erityisesti keskitytään tutkimaan sitä, miten puolueet vetoavat kansallistunteeseen, minkälaisia me-muut-jaotteluja rakennetaan ja minkälaisia eroja tai yhtäläisyyksiä puolueiden puhetapojen välillä nousee esiin. Puolueiden retoriikkaa tutkitaan analysoimalla tutkimusaineistoa Aristoteleen käsitteillä ethos-, pathos- ja logos-retoriikka. Nationalismin ilmentymiä etsitään lisäksi Michael Billigin teoksen Banal Nationalism pohjalta hahmotellun nationalistinen me-käsitteen avulla. Poliittisen puheen tapoja analysoidaan myös Kazimierz Ożógilta lainatun poliittinen me-käsitteen pohjalta ja puolueiden me-käyttöjä verrataan toisiinsa samoin kuin sitä, minkälaisia viholliskuvia ne teksteissään rakentavat. Tutkielman primaariaineiston muodostavat kyseisissä parlamenttivaaleissa neljän eniten ääniä saaneen puolueen vaaliohjelmat ja manifestit. Ennen puolueiden vaalitekstien analysoimista yksitellen tutkielmassa tehdään katsaus Puolan poliittiseen järjestelmään, sen vaiheisiin ja kehitykseen kommunismin romahduksen jälkeen sekä tilanteeseen ennen vuoden 2005 vaaleja. Koska puolueiden historia vaikuttaa suuresti niiden välisiin suhteisiin ja niiden käyttämään retoriikkaan, tutkielmassa esitellään myös neljä tutkimuskohteeksi valittua puoluetta ja kerrotaan niiden taustoista. Huomionarvoista on Puolan puoluejärjestelmälle ominainen vakiintumattomuus: vain harvat poliittiset puolueet ovat toimineet yhtämittaisesti kommunismin romahduksesta saakka ja tyypillistä on ollut puoluekentän fragmentoituminen poliitikkojen perustaessa uusia puolueita. Analysoitujen puolueiden välillä nousee esiin selkeitä eroja, mutta toisaalta myös retoriikan yhteneväisyyksiä. Erityisesti poliittisen me:n viholliset rakentuvat puolueilla identtisesti. Yleisesti ottaen viholliseksi nähdään oikeisto-vasemmisto-akselin toinen laita sekä oppositiossa olleilla puolueilla omasta suuntauksesta riippumatta edellisellä vaalikaudella vallassa ollut puolue. Nationalistisen me:n osalta hajontaa esiintyy enemmän: osa puolueista käyttää sitä pääasiassa yhtenäisyyden rakentamisessa, toiset taas ulkoisten vihollisten esittelemisessä. Retorisista keinoista ethoksen ja pathoksen käyttö nationalistisen retoriikan osana on selkeästi logoksen käyttöä yleisempää. Eroja puolueiden välillä löytyy myös sen osalta, minkä retorisen keinon käyttö on niille tyypillistä, miten ne rakentavat auktoriteetteja ja minkälaista puhetapaa ne käyttävät.

The Catholic Internet discussion on cloning : A study in cognitive rhetoric

This work combines the cognitive theory of folk-theoretical thought with the classical Aristotelian theory of artistic proof in rhetoric. The first half of the work discusses the common ground shared by the elements of artistic proof (logos, pathos, ethos) and the elements of folk-theoretical thought (naïve physics, folk biology, folk psychology, naïve sociology). Combining rhetoric with the cognitive theory of folk-theoretical thought creates a new point of view for argumentation analysis. The logos of an argument can be understood as the inferential relations established between the different parts of an argument. Consequently, within this study the analysis of logos is to be viewed as the analysis of the inferential folk-theoretical elements that make the suggested factual states-of-things appear plausible within given argumentative structures. The pathos of an argumentative structure can be understood as determining the quality of the argumentation in question in the sense that emotive elements play a great part in what can be called a distinction between good and deceptive rhetoric. In the context of this study the analysis of pathos is to be viewed as the analysis of the emotive content of argumentative structures and of whether they aim at facilitating surface- or deep cognitive elaboration of the suggested matters. The ethos of an argumentative structure means both the speaker-presentation and audience-construct that can be discerned within a body of argumentation. In the context of this study, the analysis of ethos is to be understood as the analysis of mutually manifest cognitive environments in the context of argumentation. The theory is used to analyse Catholic Internet discussion concerning cloning. The discussion is divided into six themes: Human Dignity, Sacred Family, Exploitation / Dehumanisation, Playing God, Monsters and Horror Scenarios and Ensoulment. Each theme is analysed for both the rhetorical and the cognitive elements that can be seen creating persuasive force within the argumentative structures presented. It is apparent that the Catholic voices on the Internet extensively oppose cloning. The voices utilise rhetoric that is aggressive and pejorative more often than not. Furthermore, deceptive rhetoric (in the sense presented above) plays a great part in argumentative structures of the Catholic voices. The theory of folk-theoretical thought can be seen as a useful tool for analysing the possible reasons why the Catholic speakers think about cloning and choose to present cloning in their argumentation as they do. The logos utilized in the argumentative structures presented can usually be viewed as based on folk-theoretical inference concerning biology and psychology. The structures of pathos utilized generally appear to aim at generating fear appeal in the assumed audiences, often incorporating counter-intuitive elements. The ethos utilised in the arguments generally revolves around Christian mythology and issues of social responsibility. These structures can also be viewed from the point of view of folk psychology and naïve sociological assumptions.

Struggles over legitimacy in global organizational restructuring: A rhetorical perspective on legitimation strategies and dynamics in a shutdown case

Critical organization scholars have focused increasing attention on industrial and organizational restructurings such as shutdown decisions. However, we know little about the rhetorical strategies used to legitimate or resist plant closures in organizational negotiations. In this paper, we draw from New Rhetoric to analyze rhetorical struggles, strategies and dynamics in unfolding organizational negotiations. We focus on the shutdown of the bus body unit of the Swedish company Volvo in Finland. We distinguish five types of rhetorical legitimation strategies and dynamics. These include the three classical dynamics of logos (rational arguments), pathos (emotional moral arguments), and ethos (authority-based arguments), but also autopoiesis (autopoietic narratives), and cosmos (cosmological constructions). Our analysis adds to the previous studies explaining how organizational restructuring as a phenomenon is legitimated, how this legitimation has changed over time, and how contemporary industrial closures are legitimated in the media. This study also increases our theoretical understanding of the role of rhetoric in legitimation more generally.

Struggles Over Legitimacy in Global Organizational Restructuring: A Rhetorical Perspective on Legitimation Strategies and Dynamics in a Shutdown Case

Critical organization scholars have focused increasing attention on industrial and organizational restructurings such as shutdown decisions. However, little is known about the rhetorical strategies used to legitimate or resist plant closures in organizational negotiations. In this article, we draw from New Rhetoric to analyze rhetorical struggles, strategies and dynamics in unfolding organizational negotiations. We focus on the shutdown of the bus body unit of the Sweden-based Volvo Bus Corporation in Finland. We distinguish five types of rhetorical legitimation strategies and dynamics. These include the three classical dynamics of logos (rational arguments), pathos (emotional moral arguments), and ethos (authority-based arguments), but also autopoiesis (autopoietic narratives), and cosmos (cosmological constructions). Our analysis contributes to previous studies on organizational restructuring by providing a more nuanced understanding of how contemporary industrial closures are legitimated and resisted in organizational negotiations. This study also increases theoretical understanding of the role of rhetoric in legitimation more generally.