Hammasröntgentutkimusten termoluminesenssidosimetria

Tavanomaisten hammasröntgenlaitteiden säteilyannoksia valvotaan postitettavien testipakettien ja paikan päällä tehtävien tarkastusten avulla. Säteilyannoksen valvontaan käytetään termoluminesenssidosimetrejä (Thermoluminescence Dosimetry, TLD). Dosimetreissä on TL-materiaalista valmistettuja loistekiteitä, joihin absorboitunut säteilyenergia vapautuu valona materiaalia lämmitettäessä. Prosessissa vapautuvan valon intensiteetti on suoraan verrannollinen absorboituneeseen säteilyannokseen. TLD:llä mitataan rekisteröityjen intraoraalilaitteiden tuottamaa säteilyannosta potilaan posken kohdalla. Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK) ylläpitää rekisteriä ilmoitusvelvollisuuden alaisista hammasröntgenlaitteista. Nyt hammaslaiterekisteriä ollaan uudistamassa siten, että TLD-mittaustulosten käsittely ja annoslaskenta siirtyvät rekisteristä WinTLD-laskentaohjelmaan, jossa on kaikki tarvittavat parametrit annoksen laskemiseksi. Tässä työssä TLD-mittausjärjestelmän kalibrointituloksia analysoitiin vuosilta 1996-2011 ja määritettiin uudelleen laskennassa käytetty energiakorjauskerroin, joka on osa tulevaa WinTLD-konfigurointia. Mittauksissa tarvittavat standardisäteilylaadut (ISO H-laadut) pystytettiin osana työtä. Henkilödosimetrien suorituskykytestauksessa käytetään ISO N-säteilylaatuja. Mirion Technologies (RADOS) käyttää TLD-systeemiä henkilödosimetriassa, ja hammas-TLD on tämän järjestelmän sovellus potilasdosimetriaan. ISO H-laadut otettiin käyttöön, jotta dosimetrien vastetta voitiin ISO N-laatujen tapaan tutkia jatkuvana fotonienergian funktiona Cs-137 ja Co-60 gammasäteilylaatuihin asti ja koska niillä voitiin jäljitellä todellista kliinistä suodatusta. Energiakorjauskerroin kalibroinnissa käytettävän Co-gammasäteilyn ja intraoraalikuvauksissa käytettävän röntgensäteilyn välillä määritettiin uudelleen. Sen arvoksi (yksikkö mGy/mGy) saatiin ISO N-60-laadulla 0,671 ja ISO H-60-laadulla 0,677, jotka ovat numeerisesti hyvin lähellä aikaisemmin määritettyä kerrointa 0,679. Energiakorjauskertoimen epävarmuudeksi saatiin 3,5 % (2std) ja annosmittauksen epävarmuudeksi 7,8 %. Energiavasteiden perusteella dosimetreissä käytetty materiaali on kahdesta vaihtoehdosta MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) eikä MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P). TLD-järjestelmää voidaan kehittää ja konfiguroida uusien tulosten perusteella, jolloin otetaan käyttöön muun muassa uudelleenmääritetty energiakorjauskerroin. ISO H-säteilylaadut otettiin 22.3.2011 virallisesti käyttöön STUKissa ja niitä käytetään dosimetritestauksessa tarvittaessa suuria annosnopeuksia ja annoksia.

Finnish Dosimetric Practice for Epithermal Neutron Beam Dosimetry in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a form of chemically targeted radiotherapy that utilises the high neutron capture cross-section of boron-10 isotope to achieve a preferential dose increase in the tumour. The BNCT dosimetry poses a special challenge as the radiation dose absorbed by the irradiated tissues consists of several dose different components. Dosimetry is important as the effect of the radiation on the tissue is correlated with the radiation dose. Consistent and reliable radiation dose delivery and dosimetry are thus basic requirements for radiotherapy. The international recommendations for are not directly applicable to BNCT dosimetry. The existing dosimetry guidance for BNCT provides recommendations but also calls for investigating for complementary methods for comparison and improved accuracy. In this thesis the quality assurance and stability measurements of the neutron beam monitors used in dose delivery are presented. The beam monitors were found not to be affected by the presence of a phantom in the beam and that the effect of the reactor core power distribution was less than 1%. The weekly stability test with activation detectors has been generally reproducible within the recommended tolerance value of 2%. An established toolkit for epithermal neutron beams for determination of the dose components is presented and applied in an international dosimetric intercomparison. The measured quantities (neutron flux, fast neutron and photon dose) by the groups in the intercomparison were generally in agreement within the stated uncertainties. However, the uncertainties were large, ranging from 3-30% (1 standard deviation), emphasising the importance of dosimetric intercomparisons if clinical data is to be compared between different centers. Measurements with the Exradin type 2M ionisation chamber have been repeated in the epithermal neutron beam in the same measurement configuration over the course of 10 years. The presented results exclude severe sensitivity changes to thermal neutrons that have been reported for this type of chamber. Microdosimetry and polymer gel dosimetry as complementary methods for epithermal neutron beam dosimetry are studied. For microdosimetry the comparison of results with ionisation chambers and computer simulation showed that the photon dose measured with microdosimetry was lower than with the two other methods. The disagreement was within the uncertainties. For neutron dose the simulation and microdosimetry results agreed within 10% while the ionisation chamber technique gave 10-30% lower neutron dose rates than the two other methods. The response of the BANG-3 gel was found to be linear for both photon and epithermal neutron beam irradiation. The dose distribution normalised to dose maximum measured by MAGIC polymer gel was found to agree well with the simulated result near the dose maximum while the spatial difference between measured and simulated 30% isodose line was more than 1 cm. In both the BANG-3 and MAGIC gel studies, the interpretation of the results was complicated by the presence of high-LET radiation.

Patient doses in ct, dental cone beam ct and projection radiography in Finland, with emphasis on paediatric patients

Diagnostic radiology represents the largest man-made contribution to population radiation doses in Europe. To be able to keep the diagnostic benefit versus radiation risk ratio as high as possible, it is important to understand the quantitative relationship between the patient radiation dose and the various factors which affect the dose, such as the scan parameters, scan mode, and patient size. Paediatric patients have a higher probability for late radiation effects, since longer life expectancy is combined with the higher radiation sensitivity of the developing organs. The experience with particular paediatric examinations may be very limited and paediatric acquisition protocols may not be optimised. The purpose of this thesis was to enhance and compare different dosimetric protocols, to promote the establishment of the paediatric diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), and to provide new data on patient doses for optimisation purposes in computed tomography (with new applications for dental imaging) and in paediatric radiography. Large variations in radiation exposure in paediatric skull, sinus, chest, pelvic and abdominal radiography examinations were discovered in patient dose surveys. There were variations between different hospitals and examination rooms, between different sized patients, and between imaging techniques; emphasising the need for harmonisation of the examination protocols. For computed tomography, a correction coefficient, which takes individual patient size into account in patient dosimetry, was created. The presented patient size correction method can be used for both adult and paediatric purposes. Dental cone beam CT scanners provided adequate image quality for dentomaxillofacial examinations while delivering considerably smaller effective doses to patient compared to the multi slice CT. However, large dose differences between cone beam CT scanners were not explained by differences in image quality, which indicated the lack of optimisation. For paediatric radiography, a graphical method was created for setting the diagnostic reference levels in chest examinations, and the DRLs were given as a function of patient projection thickness. Paediatric DRLs were also given for sinus radiography. The detailed information about the patient data, exposure parameters and procedures provided tools for reducing the patient doses in paediatric radiography. The mean tissue doses presented for paediatric radiography enabled future risk assessments to be done. The calculated effective doses can be used for comparing different diagnostic procedures, as well as for comparing the use of similar technologies and procedures in different hospitals and countries.