Järjestö jäänmurtajana : Suomen merimiesunioni työmarkkinaosapuolena ja suomalaisten laivatyöntekijöiden turvallisuuden vankentajana 1944-1980

Like an Icebreaker: The Finnish Seamen s Union as collective bargaining maverick and champion of sailors social safety 1944-1980. The Finnish Seamen's Union (FSU), which was established on a national basis in 1920, was one of the first Finnish trade unions to succeed in collective bargaining. In the early 1930s, the gains made in the late 1920s were lost, due to politically based internal rivalries, the Great Depression, and a disastrous strike. Unexpectedly the FSU survived and went on promoting the well-being of its members even during World War II. After the war the FSU was in an exceptionally favorable position to exploit the introduction of coordinated capitalism, which was based on social partnership between unions, employers and government. Torpedoes, mines and confiscations had caused severe losses to the Finnish merchant marine. Both ship-owners and government alike understood the crucial importance of using the remaining national shipping capacity effectively. The FSU could no longer be crushed, and so, in 1945, the union was allowed to turn all ocean-going Finnish ships into closed shops. The FSU also had another source of power. After the sailors of the Finnish icebreaker fleet also joined its ranks, the FSU could, in effect, block Finnish foreign trade in wintertime. From the late 1940s to the 1960s the union started and won numerous icebreaker strikes. Finnish seamen were thus granted special pension rights, reductions on income taxes and import duties, and other social privileges. The FSU could neither be controlled by union federations nor intimidated by employers or governments. The successful union and its tactically clever chairperson, Niilo Välläri, were continuously but erroneously accused of syndicalism. Välläri did not aim for socialism but wanted the Finnish seamen to get all the social benefits that capitalism could possibly offer. Välläri s policy was successfully followed by the FSU until the late 1980s when Finnish ship-owners were allowed to flag their vessels outside the national registry. Since then the FSU has been on the defensive and has yielded to pay cuts. The FSU members have not lost their social benefits, but they are under constant fear of losing their jobs to cheap foreign labor.

Characterization of New Viruses from Hypersaline Environments

Viruses of Archaea are the least studied group of viruses. Fewer than 50 archaeal viruses have been reported which constitutes less than one percent of all the isolated prokaryotic viruses. Only about one third of the isolated archaeal viruses infect halophiles. The diversity of haloviruses, virus ecology in highly saline environments and the interactions of haloviruses with their hosts have been little studied. The exiguous knowledge available on halophilic systems is not only due to inadequate sampling but also reflects the extra challenge highly saline systems set on biochemical studies. In this study six new haloviruses were isolated and characterized. Viruses included four archaeal viruses and two bacteriophages. All of the other isolates exhibited head-tail morphology, except SH1 which was the first tailless icosahedral virus isolated from a high salt environment. Production and purification procedures were set up for all of these viruses and they were subjected to stability determinations. Archaeal virus SH1 was studied in more detail. Biochemical studies revealed an internal membrane underneath the protein capsid and a linear dsDNA genome. The overall structure of SH1 resembles phages PRD1, PM2 and Bam35 as well as an archaeal virus STIV. SH1 possesses about 15 structural proteins that form complexes under non-reducing conditions. Quantitative dissociation provided information about the positions of these proteins in the virion. The life cycle of SH1 was also studied. This lytic virus infects Haloarcula hispanica. Adsorption to the host cells is fairly inefficient and the life cycle rather long. Finally, virus responses in a variety of ionic conditions were studied. It was discovered that all of the studied viruses from low salt, marine and high salt environments tolerated larger range of salinities than their bacterial or archaeal hosts. The adsorption efficiency was not determined by the natural environment of a virus. Even though viruses with the slowest binding kinetics were among the haloviruses, fast binders were observed in viruses from all environments. When the salinity was altered, the virus adsorption responses were diverse. Four different behavioral patterns were observed: virus binding increased or decreased in increasing salinity, adsorption maximum was at a particular salt concentration or the salinity did not affect the binding. The way the virus binding was affected did not correlate with the environment, virus morphology or the organism the virus infects.