The Relational Self, the Social Bond and the Dynamics of Personal Relationships : A Sociological Analysis

This study analyses personal relationships linking research to sociological theory on the questions of the social bond and on the self as social. From the viewpoint of disruptive life events and experiences, such as loss, divorce and illness, it aims at understanding how selves are bound to their significant others as those specific people ‘close or otherwise important’ to them. Who form the configurations of significant others? How do different bonds respond in disruptions and how do relational processes unfold? How is the embeddedness of selves manifested in the processes of bonding, on the one hand, and in the relational formation of the self, on the other? The bonds are analyzed from an anti-categorical viewpoint based on personal citations of significance as opposed to given relationship categories, such as ‘family’ or ‘friendship’ – the two kinds of relationships that in fact are most frequently significant. The study draws from analysis of the personal narratives of 37 Finnish women and men (in all 80 interviews) and their entire configurations of those specific people who they cite as ‘close or otherwise important’. The analysis stresses the subjective experiences, while also investigating the actualized relational processes and configurations of all personal relationships with certain relationship histories embedded in micro-level structures. The research is based on four empirical sub-studies of personal relationships and a summary discussing the questions of the self and social bond. Discussion draws from G. H. Mead, C. Cooley, N. Elias, T. Scheff, G. Simmel and the contributors of ‘relational sociology’. Sub-studies analyse bonds to others from the viewpoint of biographical disruption and re-configuration of significant others, estranged family bonds, peer support and the formation of the most intimate relationships into exclusive and inclusive configurations. All analyses examine the dialectics of the social and the personal, asking how different structuring mechanisms and personal experiences and negotiations together contribute to the unfolding of the bonds. The summary elaborates personal relationships as social bonds embedded in wider webs of interdependent people and social settings that are laden with cultural expectations. Regarding the question of the relational self, the study proposes both bonding and individuality as significant. They are seen as interdependent phases of the relationality of the self. Bonding anchors the self to its significant relationships, in which individuality is manifested, for example, in contrasting and differentiating dynamics, but also in active attempts to connect with others. Individuality is not a fixed quality of the self, but a fluid and interdependent phase of the relational self. More specifically, it appears in three formats in the flux of relational processes: as a sense of unique self (via cultivation of subjective experiences), as agency and as (a search for) relative autonomy. The study includes an epilogue addressing the ambivalence between the social expectation of individuality in society and the bonded reality of selves.

Food biotechnologies in Italy: a social psychological study

This dissertation presents an analysis of the representations of food biotechnologies in Italy. The thesis uses the analysis of discourse to illustrate the articulated ways in which representations are instantiated in different contexts. The theoretical thrust of the work resides in its discussion of the basic tenets of both Social Representations Theory and Discursive Psychology. The thesis offers a detailed description of the two frameworks; affinities and difference are highlighted, and a serious effort is made to develop an integrated set of theoretical resources to answer the research questions. The thesis proposes to combine a discursive methodology with Social Representations Theory. After a description of the relevant legislative framework follows an illustration of the categories used for the textual analysis. The study proposes the textual analysis of the following data: the first declaration issued by a small Italian council rejecting biotechnologies; four texts which focus on positions taken by the Catholic Church in the matter of food biotechnologies; several transcripts from a public debate in a small community of the north west of Italy. The latter study, which included an ethnographic dimension, focuses on recordings from interviews, a focus group, a public meeting and newspaper articles. Particular attention is paid to ideological representations and to the relevance of citizenship and governance to debates about food biotechnologies.

Kansalaisvaikuttamista? Habermasilaisen julkisuusteorian anti suomalaiselle ympäristöliikkeelle

Tässä pro gradu -tutkielmassa analysoidaan suomalaista ympäristöliikettä Jürgen Habermasin julkisuuden käsitteen näkökulmasta. Työn tutkimusongelmana on tarkastella julkisuutta ympäristövaikuttamisen keinona. Ponnahduslautana tutkimuksessa käytetään 2000-luvun Lapin metsien käyttöä koskevia kiistoja, joiden ratkomisyrityksiin moni Suomessa toimiva ympäristöjärjestö on osallistunut. Pitkään ratkaisemattomina olleet kiistat ovat johtaneet tilanteeseen, jossa on perusteltua kysyä, mikä ongelmien selvittämisessä on mennyt pieleen. Olisiko ennen kaikkea ammattimaiseen ja institutionalisoituneeseen vaikuttamiseen nojanneet ympäristöjärjestöt voineet toimia kiistojen yhteydessä jollakin vaihtoehtoisella tavalla? Vaihtoehdoksi esitetään Jürgen Habermasin tarjoamaa julkisuuden mallia, jonka on nähty olevan keskeinen modernin yhteiskunnan mahdollisuuksia ja rajoitteita arvioitaessa. Käsitys julkisuudesta sisältää ajatuksen kriittiseen keskusteluun pohjautuvasta, kaikille avoimesta kansalaisvaikuttamisesta. Näin muodostuneesta yleisestä mielipiteestä tulee poliittisen päätöksenteon ohjenuora. Julkisuuden ihanteen rinnalla Habermasin teoria sisältää kuvauksen julkisuuden rakennemuutoksesta – kriittisen julkisuuden alennustilasta myöhäiskapitalistisessa kulutusyhteiskunnassa. Tässä tutkimuksessa käytän näitä kahta teoreettista näkökulmaa arvioidessani nykyaikaista ympäristövaikuttamista. Keskeisin lähdeteos on Habermasin Julkisuuden rakennemuutos ja sen teoreettista perinnettä jatkaneet tutkimukset. Aineistoni koostuu kuudesta teemahaastattelusta, jotka toteutettiin keväällä 2009 Greenpeacessa, Suomen luonnonsuojeluliitossa ja WWF:ssä. Tutkimusmenetelmänä käytän teemoittelua. Sen tuloksena esiin nousevista teemoista keskeisin kertoo ympäristöjärjestöjen ammattimaistumisesta. Tulosteni mukaan ympäristövaikuttamista leimaa institutionalisoituneisuus ja hallinnollisuus, jolloin julkisuusperiaatteen toimintaedellytykset ovat heikentyneet. Julkisuuden käsitteelle löytyy kuitenkin myös varovaista tilausta suomalaisten ympäristöjärjestöjen keskuudessa.