One Word, One Body, One Voice : Studies in Apophatic Theology and Christocentric Anthropology in Gregory of Nyssa

The thesis consists of five international congress papers and a summary with an introduction. The overarching aim of the studies and the summary is to examine the inner coherency of the theological and anthropological thinking of Gregory of Nyssa (331-395). To the issue is applied an "apophatic approach" with a "Christological focus". It is suggested that the coherency is to be found from the Christological concept of unity between "true God" and "true man" in the one person of Jesus Christ. Gregory is among the first to make a full recognition of two natures of Christ, and to use this recognition systematically in his writings. The aim of the studies is pursued by the method of "identification", a combination of the modern critical "problematic method" and Gregory's own aphairetic method of "following" (akolouthia). The preoccupation with issues relating to the so-called Hellenization of Christianity in the patristic era was strong in the twentieth-century Gregory scholarship. The most discussed questions have been the Greek influence in his thought and his philosophical sources. In the five articles of the thesis it is examined how Gregory's thinking stands in its own right. The manifestly apophatic character of his theological thinking is made a part of the method of examining his thought according to the principles of his own method of following. The basic issue concerning the relation of theology and anthropology is discussed in the contexts of his central Trinitarian, anhtropological, Christological and eschatological sources. In the summary the Christocentric integration of Gregory's thinking is discussed also in relation to the issue of the alledged Hellenization. The main conclusion of the thesis concerns the concept of theology in Gregory. It is not indebted to the classical concept of theology as metaphysics or human speculation of God. Instead, it is founded to the traditional Judeo-Christian idea of God who speaks with his people face to face. In Gregory, theologia connotes the oikonomia of God's self-revelation. It may be regarded as the state of constant expression of love between the Creator and his created image. In theology, the human person becomes an image of the Word by which the Father expresses his love to "man" whom he loves as his own Son. Eventually the whole humankind, as one, gives the divine Word a physical - audible and sensible - Body. Humankind then becomes what theology is. The whole humanity expresses divine love by manifesting Christ in words and deeds, singing in one voice to the glory of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Pyhä Teresa ja keskiajan mystiikan teoriat

In my dissertation I have studied St Teresa (1515-1582) in the light of medieval mystical theories. I have two main levels in my research: historical and theological. On the historical level I study St Teresa s personal history in the context of her family and the Spanish society. On the theological level I study both St Teresa s mysticism and her religious experience in the light of medieval mysticism. St Teresa wrote a book called Life , which is her narrative autobiography and story about her mystical spiritual formation. She reflected herself through biblical texts interpreting them in the course of the biblical hermeneutics like allegory, typology, tropology and anagogy. In addition to that she read others life stories from her period of time, but reflected herself only slightly through the sociological point of view. She used irony as a means to gain acceptance to her authority and motive to write. Her position has been described as a double bind because of writing at the request of educated men and to the non-educated women as she herself was uneducated. She used irony as a means to achieve valuation to women, to gain negative attributes connected to them and to gain authority to teach them mystical spirituality, the Bible and prayer. In this ironic tendency she was a feminist writer. In order to understand medieval mysticism I have written in the first chapter a review of the main trends in medieval mysticism in connection with the classical emotional theories. Two medieval mystical theories show an important role in St Teresa s mysticism. One is love mysticism and the other is the three partite way of mysticism (purification, illumination and union). The classic-philosophical emotional theories play a role in both patterns. The theory of love mysticism St Teresa interpreted in the traditional way stressing the spiritual meaning of love in connexion with God and neighbors. Love is an emotion, which is bound with other emotions, but all objects of love don t strengthen spiritual love. In the three partite way of mysticism purification means to find biblical values in life and to practice meditative self-knowledge theologically interpreted. In illumination human understanding has to be illuminated by God and united to mystical knowledge from God. St Teresa considered illumination a way to learn things. Illumination has also psychological aspects like recognition of many trials and pains, which come from life on earth. Theologically interpreted in illumination one should die to oneself, let oneself be transformed and renewed by God. I have also written a review of the modern philosophical discussion on personal identity where memory and mental experiences are important creators of personal identity. St Teresa bound medieval mystical teaching together with her personal religious experience. Her personal identity is by its character based on her narrative life story where mental experiences play important role. Previous researchers have labelled St Teresa as an ecstatic person whose experiences produced ecstatic phenomena to the mysticism. These phenomena combined with visions have in one respect made of her a person who has brought physical and visionary tendencies to theology. In spite of that she also represents a modern tendency trying to give words to experiences, which at first seem to be exceptional and extreme and which are easily interpreted as one-sided either physical or sexual or unsaid. In other respect I have stressed the personality of St Teresa that was represented as both strong and weak. The strong personality for her is demonstrated by religious faith and in its practice. The weak personality was for her a natural personal identity. St Teresa saw a unifying aspect in almost all. Firstly, her mysticism was aimed towards union with God and secondly, the unifying aspects and common rules in human relations in community life were central. Union with God is based on the fact that in a soul God is living in its centre, where God is present in the Trinitarian way. The picture of God in ourselves is a mirror but to get to know God better is to recognize his/her presence in us. When the soul recognizes itself as a dwelling place of God, it knows itself as God knows him/herself. There is equality between God and the soul. To be a Christian means to participate in God in his Trinitarian being. The participation to God is a process of divinization that puts a person into transformation, change and renewal. The unitive aspect concludes also knowledge of opposites between experience of community and solitude as well as community and separateness. As a founder of monasteries St Teresa practiced theology of poverty. She renewed the monastic life founding a rule called discalced that stressed ascetic tendencies. Supporters of her work were after the difficulties in the beginning both society and churchly leaders. She wrote about the monasteries including in her description at times seriousness at times humor and irony. Her stories are said to be picaresque histories that contain stories of ordinary laymen and many unexpected occasions. She exercised a kind of Bakhtinian dialogue in her letters. St Teresa stressed the virtues like sacrifice, determination and courage in the monastic life. Most of what she taught of virtues is based on biblical spirituality but there are also psychological tendencies in her writings. The theological pedagogical advice is mixed with psychology, but she herself made no distinction between different aspects in her teaching. To understand St Teresa and her mysticism is to recognize that she mixes her personal religious experience and mysticism, which widens mysticism to religious experience in a new way, although this corresponds also the very definition of mysticism. St Teresa concentrated on mental-spiritual experiences and the aim of her mystical teaching was to produce a human mind well cured like a garden that has God as its gardener.

Ennalta arvaamatonta: Kehitysdiskurssin suhde suomalaisten kansalaisjärjestöjen kehitysyhteistyöhankkeisiin

Viime vuosina Suomessa on puhuttu yhä painokkaammin laadusta julkisella sektorilla. Ajan henkeen kuuluu tarkkailla panosten ja tuotosten suhdetta ja vaatia mitattavia tuloksia. Myös Suomen kehitysyhteistyöhallintoa ohjaavat tuottavuusohjelmat. Kehitysavun tavoite on ollut tehdä itsensä tarpeettomaksi, mutta koska näin ei ole käynyt, on kritiikki kehitysapua kohtaan lisääntynyt. Tämä Pro Gradu -tutkielma käsitelee kysymystä, miksei kehitysyhteistyö näytä toimivan. Tutkielman tutkimuskohteena on Suomen Ulkoasiainministeriön kansalaisjärjestöhankkeiden hanketukijärjestelmä. Esimerkkitapauksena tutkielmassa käytetään Suomen ja Indonesian WWF:n yhteistyönä toteuttamaa Borneon sydän -hanketta, jonka ensimmäinen tukikausi oli 2008–2010. Tutkielman ote on diskursiivinen ja siinä analysoidaan ensisijaisesti Borneon sydän -hankkeen hankehakemusta ja Suomen kehityspoliittista linjausta vuodelta 2007. Lisäksi aineistona käytetään haastatteluja ja nauhoituksia eri tilaisuuksista vuodelta 2011. Teoreettisen pohjan tutkielmaan luo Arturo Escobarin ajatus, jonka mukaan kehitys tulisi ymmärtää historiallisesti tuotettuna diskurssina. Tutkielmassa tuodaankin esille, että Antropologia voi korostaa kehitysdiskurssin tutkimisessa kulttuurin merkitystä. Tutkielmassa tuodaan esille, että Suomen kehityspolitiikassa kansalaisjärjestöhankkeilla nähdään olevan tärkeä rooli kehitysavun kokonaisuudessa ja niiden ensisijaiseksi tavoitteeksi asetetaan kehitysmaan kansalaisyhteiskunnan vahvistaminen. Hankkeiden laadun takaamiseksi korostetaan suunnittelun tärkeyttä. Tutkielmassa otetaan kuitenkin esille, että Ulkoasiainministeriö tarjoaa suunnittelutukea minimaalisesti. Tästä syystä on mahdollista, että paikallista ongelmakenttää ei huomioida hankkeissa tarpeeksi hyvin. Tutkielmassa myös kyseenalaistetaan, kuinka on mahdollista vahvistaa kehitysmaan kansalaisyhteiskuntaa järjestelmän, joka rajoittaa yhteistyön kolmeen vuoteen, puitteissa. Tutkielmassa esitetäänkin että paljolti rahoitusjärjestelmän takia, voidaan pikemminkin puhua suomalaisten järjestöjen työstä kehitysmaissa kuin kehitysyhteistyöstä. Tutkielmassa tulee myös esille, että sekä Ulkoasiainministeriössä että kansalaisjärjestökentällä on huomioitu riskit, jotka liittyvät tuottavuusnäkökulmaan. Ensinnäkin, jos mitattavuudesta puhutaan liikaa, voi toiminta suuntautua pelkästään sinne, mistä saadaan mitattavia tuloksia. Toiseksi, kun Suomessa puhutaan laadusta, vedetään usein suoraan yhtäläisyysmerkit laadun ja hyvin hoidetun hallinnon välille, mikä suosii suuria järjestöjä. Kolmanneksi yksittäisten kehitystoimien vaikutusten osoittaminen on vaikeaa koska toimintakenttä on hyvin monimutkainen. Tutkielmassa esitetäänkin, että on aiheellista kysyä, onko koko panos-tuotos -ketjun mielekkyys kehitysyhteistyössä kyseenalaista. Historia on osoittanut, että ei voida tietää, onko kulloinenkin kehitysinterventio toimiva vai ei. Pääväitteenä tutkielmassa onkin, että pohja kehitysajattelulle on syvällä eurooppalaisessa ajatteluperinteessä. Näin ollen kehitys ei tarkoita vain arvoa, vaan tavallaan ruudukkoa, jonka kautta tieto maailmasta jäsennetään. Ruudukko ohjaa myös sitä, mikä määritellään kehityksen tavoitteeksi ja mitkä keinoiksi. Kehitysyhteistyön keinot näyttävätkin toimivilta vain niin kauan kuin niiden suhteesta tavoitteeseen ollaan yksimielisiä. Tutkielmassa esitetäänkin, että kehitysyhteistyö ei näytä toimivan koska tavoitteiden, keinojen ja tulosten mitattavuuden välillä vallitsee jatkuva ristiriita. Lopulta tutkielmassa kysytäänkin, tulisiko kehitykseen suhtautua uudella tavalla, ja kansalaisjärjestöhankkeiden kohdalla korostaa tavoitteena kehitysyhteistyön jälkimmäistä sanaa: yhteistyötä. Näin myös siinä mielessä, että motiivi kansalaisjärjestöjen kehitysyhteistyöhankkeisiin on tutkielman mukaan usein vaikuttamishalu virallisista tavoitteista riippumatta.