46 resultados para Soil-block test
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (3)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (18)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (18)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (33)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (7)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (13)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (7)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (7)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (2)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (108)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (46)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (85)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (14)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (11)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (387)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (9)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (117)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (4)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
This paper is concerned with using the bootstrap to obtain improved critical values for the error correction model (ECM) cointegration test in dynamic models. In the paper we investigate the effects of dynamic specification on the size and power of the ECM cointegration test with bootstrap critical values. The results from a Monte Carlo study show that the size of the bootstrap ECM cointegration test is close to the nominal significance level. We find that overspecification of the lag length results in a loss of power. Underspecification of the lag length results in size distortion. The performance of the bootstrap ECM cointegration test deteriorates if the correct lag length is not used in the ECM. The bootstrap ECM cointegration test is therefore not robust to model misspecification.