Activator Protein-1 and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Interplay : In Vivo & In Vitro Studies

Critical cellular decisions such as should the cell proliferate, migrate or differentiate, are regulated by stimulatory signals from the extracellular environment, like growth factors. These signals are transformed to cellular responses through their binding to specific receptors present at the surface of the recipient cell. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R/ErbB) pathway plays key roles in governing these signals to intracellular events and cell-to-cell communication. The EGF-R forms a signaling network that participates in the specification of cell fate and coordinates cell proliferation. Ligand binding triggers receptor dimerization leading to the recruitment of kinases and adaptor proteins. This step simultaneously initiates multiple signal transduction pathways, which result in activation of transcription factors and other target proteins, leading to cellular alterations. It is known that mutations of EGF-R or in the components of these pathways, such as Ras and Raf, are commonly involved in human cancer. The four best characterized signaling pathways induced by EGF-R are the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades (MAPKs), the lipid kinase phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K), a group of transcription factors called Signal Transducers and Activator of Transcription (STAT), and the phospholipase Cγ; (PLCγ) pathways. The activation of each cascade culminates in kinase translocation to the nucleus to stimulate various transcription factors including activator protein 1 (AP-1). AP-1 family proteins are basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors that are implicated in the regulation of a variety of cellular processes (proliferation and survival, growth, differentiation, apoptosis, cell migration, transformation). Therefore, the regulation of AP-1 activity is critical for the decision of cell fate and their deregulated expression is widely associated with many types of cancers, such as breast and prostate cancers. The aims of this study were to characterize the roles of EGF-R signaling during normal development and malignant growth in vitro and in vivo using different cell lines and tissue samples. We show here that EGF-R regulates cell proliferation but is also required for regulation of AP-1 target gene expression in fibroblasts in a MAP-kinase mediated manner. Furthermore, EGF-R signaling is essential for enterocyte proliferation and migration during intestinal maturation. EGF-R signaling network, especially PI3-K-Akt pathway mediated AP-1 activity is involved in cellular survival in response to ionizing radiation. Taken together, these results elucidate the connection of EGF-R and AP-1 in various cellular contexts and show their importance in the regulation of cellular behaviour presenting new treatment cues for intestinal perforations and cancer therapy.

Molecular Modelling of Estrogen-Producing Enzymes CYP450 Aromatase and 17beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in the western countries. Approximately two-thirds of breast cancer tumours are hormone dependent, requiring estrogens to grow. Estrogens are formed in the human body via a multistep route starting from cholesterol. The final steps in the biosynthesis include the CYP450 aromatase enzyme, converting the male hormones androgens (preferred substrate androstenedione ASD) into estrogens(estrone E1), and the 17beta-HSD1 enzyme, converting the biologically less active E1 into the active hormone 17beta-hydroxyestradiol E2. E2 is bound to the nuclear estrogen receptors causing a cascade of biochemical reactions leading to cell proliferation in normal tissue, and to tumour growth in cancer tissue. Aromatase and 17beta-HSD1 are expressed in or near the breast tumour, locally providing the tissue with estrogens. One approach in treating hormone dependent breast tumours is to block the local estrogen production by inhibiting these two enzymes. Aromatase inhibitors are already on the market in treating breast cancer, despite the lack of an experimentally solved structure. The structure of 17beta-HSD1, on the other hand, has been solved, but no commercial drugs have emerged from the drug discovery projects reported in the literature. Computer-assisted molecular modelling is an invaluable tool in modern drug design projects. Modelling techniques can be used to generate a model of the target protein and to design novel inhibitors for them even if the target protein structure is unknown. Molecular modelling has applications in predicting the activities of theoretical inhibitors and in finding possible active inhibitors from a compound database. Inhibitor binding at atomic level can also be studied with molecular modelling. To clarify the interactions between the aromatase enzyme and its substrate and inhibitors, we generated a homology model based on a mammalian CYP450 enzyme, rabbit progesterone 21-hydroxylase CYP2C5. The model was carefully validated using molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) with and without the natural substrate ASD. Binding orientation of the inhibitors was based on the hypothesis that the inhibitors coordinate to the heme iron, and were studied using MDS. The inhibitors were dietary phytoestrogens, which have been shown to reduce the risk for breast cancer. To further validate the model, the interactions of a commercial breast cancer drug were studied with MDS and ligand–protein docking. In the case of 17beta-HSD1, a 3D QSAR model was generated on the basis of MDS of an enzyme complex with active inhibitor and ligand–protein docking, employing a compound library synthesised in our laboratory. Furthermore, four pharmacophore hypotheses with and without a bound substrate or an inhibitor were developed and used in screening a commercial database of drug-like compounds. The homology model of aromatase showed stable behaviour in MDS and was capable of explaining most of the results from mutagenesis studies. We were able to identify the active site residues contributing to the inhibitor binding, and explain differences in coordination geometry corresponding to the inhibitory activity. Interactions between the inhibitors and aromatase were in agreement with the mutagenesis studies reported for aromatase. Simulations of 17beta-HSD1 with inhibitors revealed an inhibitor binding mode with hydrogen bond interactions previously not reported, and a hydrophobic pocket capable of accommodating a bulky side chain. Pharmacophore hypothesis generation, followed by virtual screening, was able to identify several compounds that can be used in lead compound generation. The visualisation of the interaction fields from the QSAR model and the pharmacophores provided us with novel ideas for inhibitor development in our drug discovery project.

Structure-Function Studies of GDNF Family Ligand-RET signalling

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and its family members neurturin (NRTN), artemin (ARTN) and persephin (PSPN) are growth factors, which are involved in the development, differentiation and maintenance of many neuron types. In addition, they function outside of the nervous system, e.g. in the development of kidney, testis and liver. GDNF family ligand (GFL) signalling happens through a tetrameric receptor complex, which includes two glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored GDNF family receptor (GFRα) molecules and two RET (rearranged during transfection) receptor tyrosine kinases. Each of the ligands binds preferentially one of the four GFRα receptors: GDNF binds to GFRα1, NRTN to GFRα2, ARTN to GFRα3 and PSPN to GFRα4. The signal is then delivered by RET, which cannot bind the GFLs on its own, but can bind the GFL-GFRα complex. Under normal cellular conditions, RET is only phosphorylated on the cell surface after ligand binding. At least the GDNF-GFRα1 complex is believed to recruit RET to lipid rafts, where downstream signalling occurs. In general, GFRαs consist of three cysteine-rich domains, but all GFRα4s except for chicken GFRα4 lack domain 1 (D1). We characterised the biochemical and cell biological properties of mouse PSPN receptor GFRα4 and showed that it has a significantly weaker capacity than GFRα1 to recruit RET to the lipid rafts. In spite of that, it can phosphorylate RET in the presence of PSPN and contribute to neuronal differentiation and survival. Therefore, the recruitment of RET to the lipid rafts does not seem to be crucial for the biological activity of all GFRα receptors. Secondly, we demonstrated that GFRα1 D1 stabilises the GDNF-GFRα1 complex and thus affects the phosphorylation of RET and contributes to the biological activity. This may be important in physiological conditions, where the concentration of the ligand or the soluble GFRα1 receptor is low. Our results also suggest a role for D1 in heparin binding and, consequently, in the biodistribution of released GFRα1 or in the formation of the GFL-GFRα-RET complex. We also presented the crystallographic structure of GDNF in the complex with GFRα1 domains 2 and 3. The structure differs from the previously published ARTN-GFRα3 structure in three significant ways. The biochemical data verify the structure and reveal residues participating in the interactions between GFRα1 and GDNF, and preliminarily also between GFRα1 and RET and heparin. Finally, we showed that, the precursor of the oncogenic MEN 2B (multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2) form of RET gets phosphorylated already during its synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We also demonstrated that it associates with Src homology 2 domain-containing protein (SHC) and growth factor receptor-bound protein (GRB2) in the ER, and has the capacity to activate several downstream signalling molecules.

GABAa Receptor Mediated Signalling in the Brain: Inhibition, Shunting and Excitation

Within central nervous system, the simple division of chemical synaptic transmission to depolarizing excitation mediated by glutamate and hyperpolarizing inhibition mediated by γ-amino butyric acid (GABA), is evidently an oversimplification. The GABAa receptor (GABAaR) mediated responses can be of opposite sign within a single resting cell, due to the compartmentalized distribution of cation chloride cotransporters (CCCs). The K+/Cl- cotransporter 2 (KCC2), member of the CCC family, promotes K+ fuelled Cl- extrusion and sets the reversal potential of GABA evoked anion currents typically slightly below the resting membrane potential. The interesting ionic plasticity property of GABAergic signalling emerges from the short-term and long-term alterations in the intraneuronal concentrations of GABAaR permeable anions (Cl- and HCO3-). The short-term effects arise rapidly (in the time scale of hundreds of milliseconds) and are due to the GABAaR activation dependent shifts in anion gradients, whereas the changes in expression, distribution and kinetic regulation of CCCs are underlying the long-term effects, which may take minutes or even hours to develop. In this Thesis, the differences in the reversal potential of GABAaR mediated responses between dopaminergic and GABAergic cell types, located in the substantia nigra, were shown to be attributable to the differences in the chloride extrusion mechanisms. The stronger inhibitory effect of GABA on GABAergic neurons was due to the cell type specific expression of KCC2 whereas the KCC2 was absent from dopaminergic neurons, leading to a less prominent inhibition brought by GABAaR activation. The levels of KCC2 protein exhibited activity dependent alterations in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Intense neuronal activity, leading to a massive release of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in vivo, or applications of tyrosine receptor kinase B (TrkB) agonists BDNF or neurotrophin-4 in vitro, were shown to down-regulate KCC2 protein levels which led to a reduction in the efficacy of Cl- extrusion. The GABAergic transmission is interestingly involved in an increase of extracellular K+ concentration. A substantial increase in interstitial K+ tends to depolarize the cell membrane. The effects that varying ion gradients had on the generation of biphasic GABAaR mediated responses were addressed, with particular emphasis on the novel idea that the K+/Cl- extrusion via KCC2 is accelerated in response to a rapid accumulation of intracellular Cl-. The KCC2 inhibitor furosemide produced a large reduction in the GABAaR dependent extracellular K+ transients. Thus, paradoxically, both the inefficient KCC2 activity (via increased intracellular Cl-) and efficient KCC2 activity (via increased extracellular K+) may promote excitation.

Alternate pathways of the early secretory route in yeast

The diversity of functions of eukaryotic cells is preserved by enclosing different enzymatic activities into membrane-bound organelles. Separation of exocytic proteins from those which remain in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) casts the foundation for correct compartmentalization. The secretory pathway, starting from the ER membrane, operates by the aid of cytosolic coat proteins (COPs). In anterograde transport, polymerization of the COPII coat on the ER membrane is essential for the ER exit of proteins. Polymerization of the COPI coatomer on the cis-Golgi membrane functions for the retrieval of proteins from the Golgi for repeated use in the ER. The COPII coat is formed by essential proteins; Sec13/31p and Sec23/24p have been thought to be indispensable for the ER exit of all exocytic proteins. However, we found that functional Sec13p was not required for the ER exit of yeast endogenous glycoprotein Hsp150 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Hsp150 turned out to be an ATP phosphatase. ATP hydrolysis by a Walker motif located in the C-terminal domain of Hsp150 was an active mediator for the Sec13p and Sec24p independent ER exit. Our results suggest that in yeast cells a fast track transport route operates in parallel with the previously described cisternal maturation route of the Golgi. The fast track is used by Hsp150 with the aid of its C-terminal ATPase activity at the ER-exit. Hsp150 is matured with a half time of less than one minute. The cisternal maturation track is several-fold slower and used by other exocytic proteins studied so far. Operative COPI coat is needed for ER exit by a subset of proteins but not by Hsp150. We located a second active determinant to the Hsp150 polypeptide s N-terminal portion that guided also heterologous fusion proteins out of the ER in COPII coated vesicles under non-functional COPI conditions for several hours. Our data indicate that ER exit is a selective, receptor-mediated event, not a bulk flow. Furthermore, it suggests the existence of another retrieval pathway for essential reusable components, besides the COPI-operated retrotransport route. Additional experiments suggest that activation of the COPI primer, ADP ribosylation factor (ARF), is essential also for Hsp150 transport. Moreover, it seemed that a subset of proteins directly needed activated ARF in the anterograde transport to complete the ER exit. Our results indicate that coat structures and transport routes are more variable than it has been imagined.

ORP2 is a sterol receptor that regulates cellular lipid metabolism

ORP2 is a member of mammalian oxysterol binding protein (OSBP)-related protein/gene family (ORPs), which is found in almost every eukaryotic organism. ORPs have been suggested to participate in the regulation of cellular lipid metabolism, vesicle trafficking and cellular signaling. ORP2 is a cytosolic protein that is ubiquitously expressed and most abundant in the brain. In previous studies employing stable cell lines with constitutive ORP2 overexpression ORP2 was shown to affect cellular cholesterol metabolism. The aim of this study was to characterize the properties and function of ORP2 further. ORP2 ligands were searched for among sterols and phosphoinositides using purified ORP2 and in vitro binding assays. As expected, ORP2 bound several oxysterols and cholesterol, the highest affinity ligand being 22(R)hydroxycholesterol. In addition, affinity for anionic membrane phospholipids, phosphoinositides was observed, which may assist in the membrane targeting of ORP2. Intracellular localization of ORP2 was also investigated. ORP2 was observed on the surface of cytoplasmic lipid droplets, which are storage organelles for neutral lipids. Lipid droplet targeting of ORP2 was inhibited when 22(R)hydroxycholesterol was added to the cells or when the N-terminal FFAT-motif of ORP2 was mutated, suggesting that oxysterols and the N-terminus of ORP2 regulate the localization and the function of ORP2. The role of ORP2 in cellular lipid metabolism was studied using HeLa cell lines that can be induced to overexpress ORP2. Overexpression of ORP2 was shown to enhance cholesterol efflux from the cells resulting in a decreased amount of cellular free cholesterol. ORP2 overexpressing cells responded to the loss of cholesterol by upregulating cholesterol synthesis and uptake. Intriguingly, also cholesterol esterification was increased in ORP2 overexpressing cells. These results may be explained by the ability of ORP2 to bind and thus transport cholesterol, which most likely leads to changes in cholesterol metabolism when ORP2 is overexpressed. ORP2 function was further investigated by silencing the endogenous ORP2 expression with short interfering RNAs (siRNA) in A431 cells. Silencing of ORP2 led to a delayed break-down of triglycerides under lipolytic conditions and an increased amount of cholesteryl esters in the presence of excess triglycerides. Together these results suggest that ORP2 is a sterol-regulated protein that functions on the surface of cytoplasmic lipid droplets to regulate the metabolism of triglycerides and cholesteryl esters. Although the exact mode of ORP2 action still remains unclear, this study serves as a good basis to investigate the molecular mechanisms and possible cell type specific functions of ORP2.

Neurotrophic factors and their receptors

Four GDNF ligands (GDNF, neurturin, artemin and persephin), and mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor (MANF) and conserved dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) protect midbrain dopaminergic neurons that degenerate in Parkinson's disease. Each GDNF ligand binds a specific coreceptor GDNF family receptor α (GFRα), leading to the formation of a heterotetramer complex, which then interacts with receptor tyrosine kinase RET, the signalling receptor. The present thesis describes the structural and biochemical characterization of the GDNF2-GFRα12 complex and the MANF and CDNF proteins. Previous and current mutation data and comparison between GDNF-GFRα1 and artemin-GFRα3 binding interfaces show that N162GFRα1, I175GFRα1, V230GFRα1, Y120GDNF and L114GDNF are the specificity determinants among different ligand-coreceptor pairs. The structure suggests that sucrose octasulphate, a heparin mimic, interacts with a region R190-K202 within domain 2 of GFRα1. Mutating these residues on the GFRα1 surface, which are not in the GDNF binding region, affected RET phosphorylation, which provides a putative RET binding region in domain 2 and 3 of GFRα1. The structural comparison of the GDNF-GFRα1 and artemin-GFRα3 complexes shows a difference in bend angle between the ligand monomers. This variation in bend angle of the ligand may affect the kinetics of RET phosphorylation. To confirm that the difference is not due to crystallization artefacts, I crystallized the GDNF-GFRα1 complex without SOS in different cell dimensions. The structure of the second GDNF-GFRα1 complex is very similar to the previous one, suggesting that the difference between the artemin-GFRα3 and GDNF-GFRα1 complexes are intrinsic, not due to crystal packing. Finally, MANF and CDNF are bifunctional proteins with extracellular neurotrophic activity and ER resident cytoprotective role. The crystal structures of MANF and CDNF are presented here. Intriguingly, the structures of both the neurotrophic factors do not show structural similarity to any of previously known growth factor superfamilies; instead they are similar to saposins, the lipid-binding proteins. The N-terminal domain of MANF and CDNF contain conserved lysines and arginines on its surface, which may interact with negatively charged head groups of phospholipids, as saposins do. Thus MANF and CDNF may provide neurotrophic activities by interacting with a lipo-receptor. The structure of MANF shows a CXXC motif forming internal disulphide bridge in the natively unfolded C-terminus. This motif is common to reductases and disulphide isomerases. It is thus tempting to speculate that the CXXC motif of MANF and CDNF may be involved in oxidative protein folding, which may explain its cytoprotective role in the ER.

Structure and function of GDNF receptor alpha splice variants

The growth factors of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) family consisting of GDNF, neurturin (NRTN), artemin (ARTN) and persephin (PSPN), are involved in the development, differentiation and maintenance of many types of neurons. They also have important functions outside the nervous system in the development of kidney, testis and thyroid gland. Each of these GFLs preferentially binds to one of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored GDNF family receptors α (GFRα). GDNF binds to GFRα1, NRTN to GFRα2, ARTN to GFRα3 and PSPN to GFRα4. The GFLs in the complex with their cognate GFRα receptors all bind to and signal through the receptor tyrosine kinase RET. Alternative splicing of the mouse GFRα4 gene yields three splice isoforms. These had been described as putative GPI-anchored, transmembrane and soluble forms. My goal was to characterise the function of the different forms of mouse GFRα4. I firstly found that the putative GPI-anchored GFRα4 (GFRα4-GPI) is glycosylated, membrane-bound, GPI-anchored and interacts with PSPN and RET. We also showed that mouse GFRα4-GPI mediates PSPN-induced phosphorylation of RET, promotes PSPN-dependent neuronal differentiation of the rat pheochromocytoma cell line PC6-3 and PSPN-dependent survival of cerebellar granule neurons (CGN). However, although this receptor can mediate PSPN-signalling and activate RET, GFRα4-GPI does not recruit RET into lipid rafts. The recruitment of RET into lipid rafts has previously been thought to be a crucial event for GDNF- and GFL-mediated signalling via RET. I secondly demonstrated that the putative transmembrane GFRα4 (GFRα4-TM) is indeed a real transmembrane GFRα4 protein. Although it has a weak binding capacity for PSPN, it can not mediate PSPN-dependent phosphorylation of RET, neuronal differentiation or survival. These data show that GFRα4-TM is inactive as a receptor for PSPN. Surprisingly, GFRα4-TM can negatively regulate PSPN-mediated signalling via GFRα4-GPI. GFRα4-TM interacts with GFRα4-GPI and blocks PSPN-induced phosphorylation of RET, neuronal differentiation as well as survival. Taken together, our data show that GFRα4-TM may act as a dominant negative inhibitor of PSPN-mediated signaling. The most exciting part of my work was the finding that the putative soluble GFRα4 (GFRα4-sol) can form homodimers and function as an agonist of the RET receptor. In the absence of PSPN, GFRα4-sol can promote the phosphorylation of RET, trigger the activation of the PI-3K/AKT pathway, induce neuronal differentiation and support the survival of CGN. Our findings are in line with a recent publication showing the GFRα4-sol might contribute to the inherited cancer syndrome multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Our data provide an explanation to how GFRα4-sol may cause or modify the disease. Mammalian GFRα4 receptors all lack the first Cys-rich domain which is present in other GFRα receptors. In the final part of my work I have studied the function of this particular domain. I created a truncated GFRα1 construct lacking the first Cys-rich domain. Using binding assays in both cellular and cell-free systems, phosphorylation assays with RET, as well as neurite outgrowth assays, we found that the first Cys-rich domain contributes to an optimal function of GFRα1, by stabilizing the interaction between GDNF and GFRα1.