I kläm mellan vision och verklighet - en etnografisk fallstudie av en webbredaktion

I avhandlingen analyseras arbetsprocesserna vid en webbredaktion. Undersökningen är en etnografisk fallstudie där Hufvudstadsbladets webbproduktion fungerar som case. Den övergripande frågeställningen är hur växelverkan mellan tidningsredaktionen och webbredaktionen fungerar och varför. Syftet var att hitta och synliggöra de underliggande spänningar i organisationen som bimedialiteten kan ha gett upphov till, och analysera produktionen mot bakgrund av tidigare forskning. Analysen behandlar tre områden som ofta återkommer i mediekonvergensforskningen, det vill säga organisation, innehåll och inställning. Forskningsmaterialet är insamlat med hjälp av observation, intervjuer och en e-postenkät. Arbetet på redaktionen observerades under sex arbetsskift. Webbreporterns arbete observerades, observationerna antecknades och efter varje arbetsskift bandades en intervju med webbreportern. Utöver dessa intervjuer gjordes ytterligare tre intervjuer med två nyhetschefer och chefredaktören. En e-postenkät med öppna frågor skickades ut till samtliga redaktionsmedlemmar. Avhandlingen tar avstamp i mediekonvergensforskning, redaktionsforskning och aktivitetsteori. Eftersom den teoretiska utgångspunkten delvis ligger inom aktivitetsteori och utvecklande arbetsforskning räknades samtidigt störningar i arbetsprocessen för att kunna identifiera underliggande spänningar i organisationen. Alla händelser som innebar ett längre eller kortare avbrott i arbetsprocessen antecknades och delades in i kategorier. Sammanlagt sextio störningar identifierades, varav den största andelen, en tredjedel, konstaterades bero på organisations- och kommunikationsfaktorer, främst till följd av bristfällig intern kommunikation. Slutsatserna är webbproduktionen till följd av heterogena objekt i aktivitetssystemet - oklara mål och oklarhet gällande webbens roll i organisationen sitter fast i klyftan mellan ledningens vision och verkligheten på redaktionen. Ett flertal motstridiga uppfattningar om webbproduktionens roll råder på redaktionen. Det leder till störningar i arbetsprocessen som i sin tur gör att produktionen haltar och inte utvecklas. Oklarheten kring målen leder till oklarhet kring konkret praxis, kommunikationssvårigheter, missförstånd och en sned arbetsfördelning, som samtliga inverkar på smidigheten i produktionen.

Lojalitet i licensavtal

Loyalty in Licensing Agreements The purpose of the dissertation is to analyse the impact of the principle of loyalty on licensing agreements from the viewpoint of Finnish law using the traditional legal method (Rechtsdogmatik) combined with empirical data in the form of licensing agreements. The need for good licensing agreements is crucial. One should avoid mechanical and stereotyped agreements in favour of more conscious and goal-oriented ones. When the parties' will and goals have been made clear, the drafting technique should be chosen accordingly. The importance of the principle of loyalty in the interpretation of licensing agreements varies according to their degree of relationality. This is a concept originating in the relational contract theory, more precisely Ian Macneil's spectrum of contracts, where contracts can be placed on an axis according to their degree of relationality. In the dissertation different factors are used to conclude whether the licensing agreement at hand is to be placed on the axis closer to the transactional pole or closer to the relational pole. A conclusion of the dissertation is that few licensing agreements can be placed so close to the transactional pole, that the principle of loyalty lacks importance altogether. The impact of the principle of loyalty the main focus of which is on fostering the contracting parties to behave in accordance with best practices, not for example on altering contract terms is analysed in different situations where the parties' interests typically collide. These situations are discussed from the point of view of three patent and knowhow licensing agreements that differ as to their degree of relationality. A balance needs to be struck between freedom of contract and relational needs. Especially when interpreting more modern licensing agreements, one should not focus on the written document alone, as is often recommended in the literature on Nordic intellectual property law. Neither is the principle of caveat emptor a proper starting point. Moreover, where the parties are of equal bargaining power, one should not assume that the grants in licensing agreements are to be interpreted narrowly. Focus in the interpretation should instead be on the entirety of the circumstances.

Cognitive functioning and its heritability in bipolar I disorder

Bipolar I disorder is a severe psychiatric disorder characterized by episodic mood alterations that can be manic, depressive or mixed. Bipolar disorder seems to be highly genetic, but the etiology of this complex disorder has remained elusive. In recent years, studies have found that euthymic patients with bipolar disorder may have impairments particularly in executive functioning, verbal learning and memory. These impairments may be present also among some of the relatives of these patients, who may be vulnerable to the disorder. Using neuropsychological variables as endophenotypes, i.e. intermediate phenotypes between genes and the phenotypes, has been suggested to aid search for the etiological background of the disorder, but evidence is sparse on whether these variables fulfill the criteria for endophenotypes. The present thesis is part of the Genetic Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics of Severe Mental Disorders in Finland project. The specific aim was to investigate whether neuropsychological test variables would indicate genetic liability to the disorder and could therefore be regarded as endophenotypes. Thus, cognitive functions and their heritability were studied in bipolar I disorder patients and in their unaffected first-degree relatives from a population-based sample of families, comparing them to a population-based control group. In order to add homogeneity to the subgroups of bipolar disorder patients and their relatives, cognitive functions and their heritability were further studied in a group of families affected by bipolar I disorder only (bipolar families) and another group of families affected by both bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders (mixed families). Finally, the effect of processing speed on other cognitive functions was investigated. The study showed that especially executive functioning and processing speed fulfilled the endophenotype criteria. Impairments in these functions were found in bipolar patients and in their relatives irrespective of other severe psychopathology in the family. These functions were highly heritable in these families. Study also showed that generalized impairment in verbal memory may associate more with bipolar disorder than to vulnerability to other psychotic disorders, and be more related to fully developed disease; impairments in verbal learning and memory were found only in patients, and they were not found to be highly heritable. Finally, the most potential endophenotype, i.e. processing speed, seemed to contribute to a range of other cognitive dysfunctions seen in bipolar disorder patients. Processing speed, in particular, has also been shown to be a valid endophenotype in subsequent association analyses in psychiatric genetics in Finland and internationally. Information concerning cognitive impairments and their association with the psychosocial consequences of bipolar disorder is important in planning treatment. It is also important to understand and acknowledge that patients may have cognitive impairments that affect their everyday life. Psychosocial interventions and neuropsychological rehabilitation may supplement other conventional treatments for bipolar patients.