1 resultado para antipredator defence
em Glasgow Theses Service
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (10)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (59)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (21)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Brock University, Canada (13)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (12)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (86)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (18)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (15)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (7)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (6)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (62)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (12)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (6)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (48)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (30)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (124)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (140)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (6)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (8)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (9)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (6)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (25)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (5)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (33)
- University of Michigan (113)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (32)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (6)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
I argue (1) that Alvin Plantinga’s theory of warrant is plausible and (2) that, contrary to the Pandora’s Box objection, there are certain serious world religions that cannot successfully use Plantinga’s epistemology to demonstrate that their beliefs could be warranted in the same way that Christian belief can be warranted. In arguing for (1), I deploy Ernest Sosa’s Swampman case to show that Plantinga’s proper function condition is a necessary condition for warrant. I then engage three objections to Plantinga’s theory of warrant, each of which attempts to demonstrate that his conditions for warrant are neither necessary nor sufficient. Having defended the plausibility of Plantinga’s theory of warrant, I present and expand his key arguments to the effect that naturalism cannot make use of it. These arguments provide the conceptual tools that are needed to argue for (2): that there are certain world religions that cannot legitimately use Plantinga’s theory of warrant to demonstrate that their beliefs could be warranted in the same way that Christian belief can be warranted.