1 resultado para Behavioral flexibility
em Glasgow Theses Service
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (28)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (31)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (81)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (23)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (39)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (6)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (8)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (30)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (31)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (7)
- Duke University (17)
- Düsseldorfer Dokumenten- und Publikationsservice (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (28)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (31)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (45)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (81)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (5)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (79)
- Repositorio Institucional UNISALLE - Colombia (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scielo España (2)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (16)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (7)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (8)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (16)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (7)
- University of Michigan (34)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (27)
- University of Washington (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Background: The Flexibility of Responses to Self-Critical Thoughts Scale (FoReST) is a questionnaire that was developed to assess whether people can be psychologically flexible when experiencing critical thoughts about themselves. This measure could have important application for evaluating third wave therapies such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Compassion Focused therapy (CFT). This study investigated the validity (concurrent, predictive and incremental), internal consistency and factor structure of the FoReST in a sample of people experiencing mental health difficulties. Method: A total of 132 individuals attending Primary Care and Community Mental Health Teams within NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GGC) and Psychological Therapy Teams within NHS Lanarkshire participated in this study. Participants completed a battery of assessments that included the FoReST and related measures of similar constructs (psychological flexibility, self-compassion and self-criticism) and measures of mental health and well-being. A cross-sectional correlational design was used. Results: An Exploratory factor analysis described an interpretable 2-factor structure within the items of the FoReST: unworkable action and experiential avoidance. The FoReST demonstrated good internal consistency ( = .89). Concurrent validity was supported through moderate to strong correlations with similar measures and moderate correlations with other mental health and well-being outcomes. Conclusions: The FoReST appears to be a valid assessment measure for using with individuals experiencing mental health difficulties. This new measure will be of use for practitioners using ACT, CFT and those integrating both, to help monitor the process of change in flexibility and self-critical thinking across therapy. Further longitudinal studies are required to assess the test-retest reliability of the FoReST.