DiCER: A distributed consumer experience research method for use in public spaces

Date of Acceptance: 06/03/2015 Acknowledgement: This research was funded by NCR and the Northern Research Partnership

DiCER: A distributed consumer experience research method for use in public spaces

Date of Acceptance: 06/03/2015 Acknowledgement: This research was funded by NCR and the Northern Research Partnership

Exploring the rural passenger experience, information needs and decision making during public transport disruption

Acknowledgements The research described here is supported by the award made by the RCUK Digital Economy programme to the dot.rural Digital Economy Research Hub; award reference: EP/G066051/1. Further, we would like to acknowledge the RCUK research grant EP/J000604/2.

22 years of Predictive Testing for Huntington’s Disease : The Experience of the UK Huntington’s Prediction Consortium

Peer reviewed

You'll Never Ride Alone: The Role of Social Media in Supporting the Bus Passenger Experience

Postprint

Introspection Planning: Representing Metacognitive Experience

Postprint

Experience with Learning Agents which Manage Internet-Based Information

Postprint

Experience with Rule Induction & k-Nearest Neighbour Methods for Interface Agents that Learn

Peer reviewed

DiCER: A distributed consumer experience research method for use in public spaces

Date of Acceptance: 06/03/2015 Acknowledgement: This research was funded by NCR and the Northern Research Partnership

22 years of Predictive Testing for Huntington’s Disease : The Experience of the UK Huntington’s Prediction Consortium

Corrigendum European Journal of Human Genetics (2016) 24, 1515; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2016.81 22 Years of predictive testing for Huntington’s disease: the experience of the UK Huntington’s Prediction Consortium Sheharyar S Baig, Mark Strong, Elisabeth Rosser, Nicola V Taverner, Ruth Glew, Zosia Miedzybrodzka, Angus Clarke, David Craufurd, UK Huntington's Disease Prediction Consortium and Oliver W Quarrell Correction to: European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 11 May 2016; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.36 Post online publication the authors realised that they had made an error: The sentence on page 2: 'In the first 5-year period........but this changed significantly in the last 5-year period with 51% positive and 49% negative (χ2=20.6, P<0.0001)' should read: 'In the first 5-year period........but this changed significantly in the last 5-year period with 49% positive and 51% negative (χ2=20.6, P<0.0001)'.