Soil Micro Testing

Soil Micro Testing for nematodes on grain farms.

Genetic Options for nematode control

Root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus thornei and P. neglectus) cause severe economic loss in wheat in Australia. This project aims to develop adaptaed wheat lines with resistance and tolerance to both species. These lines will be made available to Australian wheat breeding companies for further crossing and development of resistant and tolerant wheat varieties. Sources of resistance will be synthetic hexaploid and landrace wheats from the Middle East. Suitable double haploid populations will be phenotyped for the development of molecular markers to resistance and tolerance genes. The value of resistance and tolerance will be extended to growers through collaboration in demonstration trials with NGA and ORANA and presentations at GRDC Updates.

Crop sequences to manage soil pathogens and increase northern grain production

This is part of a GRDC funded project led by Dr Jeremy Whish of CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences. The project aims to build a root-lesion nematode module into the crop growth simulation program APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems Simulator). This will utilise existing nematode and crop data from field, glasshouse and laboratory research led by Dr John Thompson. New data will be collected to validate and extend the model.

Resistance to root-lesion Nematodes for development of molecular markers

This is a sub-project of the Australian Wheat and Barley Molecular Marker Program funded by GRDC and led by Drs Diane Mather and Ken Chalmers of University of Adelaide. In this sub-project we will supply phenotypic data on resistance to two species of root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus thornei and P. neglectus) on several populations of wheat doubled haploids. We will also supply existing genotypic data on one doubled haploid population. We will also test one population of doubled haploids (CPI133872/Janz) a second time for resistance to P. thornei and P. neglectus and supply this information to University of Adelaide for the development of molecular markers for use by wheat breeders in selecting for resistance to root-lesion nematodes.

Cropping options to limit root-lesion nematodes

Australia’s northern grain-producing region is unique in that the root-lesion nematode (RLN), Pratylenchus thornei predominates. P. neglectus is also present. RLN cause substantial yield losses, particularly in wheat, but they reproduce on numerous summer and winter crops. Each nematode species prefers different crops and varieties. This project provides growers with a range of integrated management strategies to limit RLN (i.e. identify the problem, protect uninfested fields, rotate with resistant crops to keep populations low and choose tolerant crops to maximise yields). It also provides new information about soil-borne zoosporic fungi in the region.

Synthetic Evaluation Project - Nematodes

The project tests synthetic hexaploid wheats for resistance to root-lesion nematodes.

A generic method of engagement to elicit regional coastal management options

Stakeholder engagement is important for successful management of natural resources, both to make effective decisions and to obtain support. However, in the context of coastal management, questions remain unanswered on how to effectively link decisions made at the catchment level with objectives for marine biodiversity and fisheries productivity. Moreover, there is much uncertainty on how to best elicit community input in a rigorous manner that supports management decisions. A decision support process is described that uses the adaptive management loop as its basis to elicit management objectives, priorities and management options using two case studies in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The approach described is then generalised for international interest. A hierarchical engagement model of local stakeholders, regional and senior managers is used. The result is a semi-quantitative generic elicitation framework that ultimately provides a prioritised list of management options in the context of clearly articulated management objectives that has widespread application for coastal communities worldwide. The case studies show that demand for local input and regional management is high, but local influences affect the relative success of both engagement processes and uptake by managers. Differences between case study outcomes highlight the importance of discussing objectives prior to suggesting management actions, and avoiding or minimising conflicts at the early stages of the process. Strong contributors to success are a) the provision of local information to the community group, and b) the early inclusion of senior managers and influencers in the group to ensure the intellectual and time investment is not compromised at the final stages of the process. The project has uncovered a conundrum in the significant gap between the way managers perceive their management actions and outcomes, and community's perception of the effectiveness (and wisdom) of these same management actions.