1 resultado para Latent class model
em eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (43)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (18)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (24)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (31)
- Boston University Digital Common (5)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (7)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (15)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (41)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (14)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (11)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (69)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- Digital Peer Publishing (9)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (14)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (16)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (55)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (11)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (21)
- Nottingham eTheses (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (47)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (210)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (3)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (46)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (8)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (16)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (25)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (21)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The feasibility of state-wide eradication of 41 invasive plant taxa currently listed as ‘Class 1 declared pests’ under the Queensland Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002 was assessed using the predictive model ‘WeedSearch’. Results indicated that all but one species (Alternanthera philoxeroides) could be eradicated, provided sufficient funding and labour were available. Slightly less than one quarter (24.4%) (n = 10) of Class 1 weed taxa could be eradicated for less than $100 000 per taxon. An additional 43.9% (n = 18) could be eradicated for between $100 000 and $1M per taxon. Hence, 68.3% of Class 1 weed taxa (n = 28) could be eradicated for less than $1M per taxon. Eradication of 29.3% (n = 12) is predicted to cost more than $1M per taxon. Comparison of these WeedSearch outputs with either empirical analysis or results from a previous application of the model suggests that these costs may, in fact, be underestimates. Considering the likelihood that each weed will cost the state many millions of dollars in long-term losses (e.g. losses to primary production, environmental impacts and control costs), eradication seems a wise investment. Even where predicted costs are over $1M, eradication can still offer highly favourable benefit:cost ratios. The total (cumulative) cost of eradication of all 41 weed taxa is substantial; for all taxa, the estimated cost of eradication in the first year alone is $8 618 000. This study provides important information for policy makers, who must decide where to invest public funding.