1 resultado para few-body problems
em Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (8)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (16)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (11)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (8)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (29)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (54)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (12)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (581)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (92)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (10)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (5)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (4)
- University of Washington (4)
Resumo:
This Article examines the adverse impact theory of employment discrimination under Title VII. The author begins by discussing the development of adverse impact in the case law, and by scrutinizing its theoretical underpinnings. He demonstrates that Congress did not intend to mandate adoption of adverse impact theory when it established Title VII. The author then argues that the Courts have exceeded their authority under Title VII by embracing the theory of adverse impact. He concludes that the courts should therefore return to a narrower theory of employment discrimination, namely, a theory based on the legal concept of “intent.”