1 resultado para adverse emotional events
em Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (26)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (15)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (19)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (108)
- Boston University Digital Common (7)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (19)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (23)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (37)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (39)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (58)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (24)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (22)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (383)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (16)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (21)
- University of Washington (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This Article examines the adverse impact theory of employment discrimination under Title VII. The author begins by discussing the development of adverse impact in the case law, and by scrutinizing its theoretical underpinnings. He demonstrates that Congress did not intend to mandate adoption of adverse impact theory when it established Title VII. The author then argues that the Courts have exceeded their authority under Title VII by embracing the theory of adverse impact. He concludes that the courts should therefore return to a narrower theory of employment discrimination, namely, a theory based on the legal concept of “intent.”