1 resultado para Imperative mandate
em Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (26)
- Archive of European Integration (13)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (35)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (11)
- Boston University Digital Common (7)
- Brock University, Canada (16)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (7)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (37)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (18)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (6)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (6)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (6)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (6)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (10)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (38)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (13)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (68)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (266)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (6)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (6)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (9)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (51)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (74)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (13)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
This Article examines the adverse impact theory of employment discrimination under Title VII. The author begins by discussing the development of adverse impact in the case law, and by scrutinizing its theoretical underpinnings. He demonstrates that Congress did not intend to mandate adoption of adverse impact theory when it established Title VII. The author then argues that the Courts have exceeded their authority under Title VII by embracing the theory of adverse impact. He concludes that the courts should therefore return to a narrower theory of employment discrimination, namely, a theory based on the legal concept of “intent.”