1 resultado para Courts and courtiers
em Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (20)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (24)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (6)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (8)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (7)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (7)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Harvard University (8)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (111)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (141)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (17)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (22)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (22)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (332)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (6)
Resumo:
This Article examines the adverse impact theory of employment discrimination under Title VII. The author begins by discussing the development of adverse impact in the case law, and by scrutinizing its theoretical underpinnings. He demonstrates that Congress did not intend to mandate adoption of adverse impact theory when it established Title VII. The author then argues that the Courts have exceeded their authority under Title VII by embracing the theory of adverse impact. He concludes that the courts should therefore return to a narrower theory of employment discrimination, namely, a theory based on the legal concept of “intent.”