1 resultado para Artistic practices
em Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (38)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (18)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (3)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (18)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (21)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (6)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (17)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (28)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (24)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (10)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (152)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (463)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (12)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (42)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (6)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The Ticket to Work program offered disabled and blind social security beneficiaries the promise of greater choice when selecting a vocational rehabilitation provider. With the issuance of Transmittal #17, much of the opportunity to choose a provider was removed. The Protection and Advocacy agency in Indiana took steps to protect the rights of disabled and blind beneficiaries to choose providers in the face of this significant policy change. Learn what was done to protect the rights and ability of beneficiaries to seek and choose vocational rehabilitation providers.