1 resultado para Adverse Event Reporting
em Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (4)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- Aquatic Commons (18)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (45)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (24)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (4)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (30)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (11)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (20)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (21)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (9)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (202)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (345)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (17)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (13)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (14)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Michigan (4)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (17)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This Article examines the adverse impact theory of employment discrimination under Title VII. The author begins by discussing the development of adverse impact in the case law, and by scrutinizing its theoretical underpinnings. He demonstrates that Congress did not intend to mandate adoption of adverse impact theory when it established Title VII. The author then argues that the Courts have exceeded their authority under Title VII by embracing the theory of adverse impact. He concludes that the courts should therefore return to a narrower theory of employment discrimination, namely, a theory based on the legal concept of “intent.”