Test-Retest Reliability of Resting-State Magnetoencephalography Power in Sensor and Source Space

Several studies have reported changes in spontaneous brain rhythms that could be used asclinical biomarkers or in the evaluation of neuropsychological and drug treatments in longitudinal studies using magnetoencephalography (MEG). There is an increasing necessity to use these measures in early diagnosis and pathology progression; however, there is a lack of studies addressing how reliable they are. Here, we provide the first test-retest reliability estimate of MEG power in resting-state at sensor and source space. In this study, we recorded 3 sessions of resting-state MEG activity from 24 healthy subjects with an interval of a week between each session. Power values were estimated at sensor and source space with beamforming for classical frequency bands: delta (2–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), low beta (13–20 Hz), high beta (20–30 Hz), and gamma (30–45 Hz). Then, test-retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We also evaluated the relation between source power and the within-subject variability. In general, ICC of theta, alpha, and low beta power was fairly high (ICC > 0.6) while in delta and gamma power was lower. In source space, fronto-posterior alpha, frontal beta, and medial temporal theta showed the most reliable profiles. Signal-to-noise ratio could be partially responsible for reliability as low signal intensity resulted inhigh within-subject variability, but also the inherent nature of some brain rhythms in resting-state might be driving these reliability patterns. In conclusion, our results described the reliability of MEG power estimates in each frequency band, which could be considered in disease characterization or clinical trials.

Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts

Proportion correct in two-alternative forcedchoice (2AFC) detection tasks often varies when the stimulus is presented in the first or in the second interval.Reanalysis of published data reveals that these order effects (or interval bias) are strong and prevalent, refuting the standard difference model of signal detection theory. Order effects are commonly regarded as evidence that observers use an off-center criterion under the difference model with bias. We consider an alternative difference model with indecision whereby observers are occasionally undecided and guess with some bias toward one of the response options. Whether or not the data show order effects, the two models fit 2AFC data indistinguishably, but they yield meaningfully different estimates of sensory parameters. Under indeterminacy as to which model governs 2AFC performance, parameter estimates are suspect and potentially misleading. The indeterminacy can be circumvented by modifying the response format so that observers can express indecision when needed. Reanalysis of published data collected in this way lends support to the indecision model. We illustrate alternative approaches to fitting psychometric functions under the indecision model and discuss designs for 2AFC experiments that improve the accuracy of parameter estimates, whether or not order effects are apparent in the data.

Estabilidad del espectro de potencia en resting state: un estudio de fiabilidad con Magnetoencefalografía

La sincronización de las oscilaciones cerebrales se produce incluso en ausencia de tarea, por eso, el resting state está aportando interesantes vías de estudio de los procesos normales y patológicos. Dada la creciente necesidad por utilizar las medidas derivadas de las señales MEG en resting state como biomarcadores clínicos o en la evaluación de tratamientos, es necesario garantizar su fiabilidad. En este estudio se ha investigado por primera vez la fiabilidad de la las medidas espectrales derivadas de registros MEG explorando la estabilidad en resting state de la potencia de 10 sujetos sanos en tres sesiones con un intervalo test-retest de 7 días. A partir de las señales MEG de cada sujeto y sesión se calculó el espectro de potencia de 1 a 100Hz en cada sensor, y como medida de fiabilidad se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación intraclase (ICC). Para explorar cómo afecta la intensidad de la señal a la estabilidad, se registró la señal de la cámara vacía en cada sesión de registro y se calculó la relación señal/ruido (SNR). La potencia espectral en MEG es muy estable en las bandas de frecuencia α, β y θ, y menos estable en δ y γ-2. Con respecto a la distribución de la estabilidad, la señal capturada en la zona frontal del equipo MEG fue la menos estable a través de todas las bandas de frecuencia. La estabilidad mostró cierta tendencia a disminuir conforme disminuye la SNR; este efecto es parcial, ya que los ritmos cerebrales estables mostraron un alto ICC incluso con baja SNR. En conjunto, estos resultados sugieren que las medidas espectrales en resting state con MEG son suficientemente fiables para ser consideradas en futuros estudios longitudinales sobre cambios en la actividad cerebral.

The difference model with guessing explains interval bias in two-alternative forced- chocice detection procedures

The standard difference model of two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks implies that performance should be the same when the target is presented in the first or the second interval. Empirical data often show “interval bias” in that percentage correct differs significantly when the signal is presented in the first or the second interval. We present an extension of the standard difference model that accounts for interval bias by incorporating an indifference zone around the null value of the decision variable. Analytical predictions are derived which reveal how interval bias may occur when data generated by the guessing model are analyzed as prescribed by the standard difference model. Parameter estimation methods and goodness-of-fit testing approaches for the guessing model are also developed and presented. A simulation study is included whose results show that the parameters of the guessing model can be estimated accurately. Finally, the guessing model is tested empirically in a 2AFC detection procedure in which guesses were explicitly recorded. The results support the guessing model and indicate that interval bias is not observed when guesses are separated out.