1 resultado para moisture-exposed cracks in mica
em Universidade Complutense de Madrid
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (15)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (26)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (11)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (48)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (52)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (78)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (40)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (6)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (8)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (12)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (11)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (52)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (16)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (13)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (46)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (89)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (36)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (199)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (9)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
Resumo:
Objectives: To characterise antimicrobial use (AMU) per production stage in terms of drugs, routes of application, indications, duration and exposed animals in farrow-to-finish pig farms in Spain. Design: Survey using a questionnaire on AMU during the six months prior to the interview, administered in face-to-face interviews completed from April to October 2010. Participants: 108 potentially eligible farms covering all the country were selected using a multistage sampling methodology; of these, 33 were excluded because they did not fulfil the participation criteria and 49 were surveyed. Results: The rank of the most used antimicrobials per farm and production stage and administration route started with polymyxins (colistin) by feed during the growing and the preweaning phases, followed by β-lactams by feed during the growing and the preweaning phases and by injection during the preweaning phase. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that the growing stage (from weaning to the start of finishing) has the highest AMU according to different quantitative indicators (number of records, number of antimicrobials used, percentage of farms reporting use, relative number of exposed animals per farm and duration of exposure); feed is the administration route that produces the highest antimicrobial exposure based on the higher number of exposed animals and the longer duration of treatment; and there are large differences in AMU among individual pig farms.