1 resultado para SAMPLE SIZE
em Universidade Complutense de Madrid
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (18)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (19)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (25)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (83)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (14)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (61)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (13)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (6)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (77)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (14)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (6)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (49)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (137)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (12)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (122)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (23)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (8)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (18)
- University of Washington (7)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Observations of cosmic rays arrival directions made with the Pierre Auger Observatory have previously provided evidence of anisotropy at the 99% CL using the correlation of ultra high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) with objects drawn from the Veron-Cetty Veron catalog. In this paper we report on the use of three catalog independent methods to search for anisotropy. The 2pt-L, 2pt+ and 3pt methods, each giving a different measure of self-clustering in arrival directions, were tested on mock cosmic ray data sets to study the impacts of sample size and magnetic smearing on their results, accounting for both angular and energy resolutions. If the sources of UHECRs follow the same large scale structure as ordinary galaxies in the local Universe and if UHECRs are deflected no more than a few degrees, a study of mock maps suggests that these three method can efficiently respond to the resulting anisotropy with a P-value = 1.0% or smaller with data sets as few as 100 events. using data taken from January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2010 we examined the 20, 30, ... , 110 highest energy events with a corresponding minimum energy threshold of about 49.3 EeV. The minimum P-values found were 13.5% using the 2pt-L method, 1.0% using the 2pt+ method and 1.1% using the 3pt method for the highest 100 energy events. In view of the multiple (correlated) scans performed on the data set, these catalog-independent methods do not yield strong evidence of anisotropy in the highest energy cosmic rays.