Personalidad, género y vulnerabilidad a la depresión :(Women and vulnerability to depression : some personality and clinical factors)

En este trabajo se exploraron relaciones existentes entre las características de personalidad, género y la presencia de depresión, siguiendo la linea de investigación de Carrillo, Rojo y Staats (2004). Se intentó encontrar perfiles de personalidad caracterizados por determinados rasgos que fueran significativamente distintos entre hombres y mujeres y que a su vez se asociaran a una mayor presencia de síntomas depresivos. Esto se llevó a cabo en dos muestras de distintos países y culturas por separado: Chile (N= 448, 257 varones (57.37%) y 190 mujeres (42.41%), y un rango etario de 17-65) y España (N = 578, 196 varones (33.9%) y 381 mujeres (65,9%), y un rango etario de 17-67 ), con el propósito de aportar evidencia respecto de cómo afecta la cultura, como factor ambiental, en la conformación de la personalidad a partir de repertorios de aprendizajes. Orientado a eso en el presente trabajo se intentó buscar asociaciones significativas entre las dimensiones de Personalidad propuestas por Eysenk (1975), en el EPQ y EPQ-R, por los factores de Personalidad de los Cinco grandes a partir del NEO PI y del NEO PI-R (Costa y McCrae, 1985, citado en Carrillo et al. 2004) y otras variables clínicas, como rasgos de personalidad esquizotipicos, frecuencia e intensidad de emociones, habilidades sociales y sintomatología clínica. Las características de personalidad se compararon en función del género y finalmente se analizó si las diferencias de personalidad pudieron predecir depresión a partir del Beck Depression Inventory, (Beck, Rush, Shaw y Emery, 1979)...

Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer

Purpose To compare measurements taken using a swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer (IOLmaster 700) and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar 900), and to determine the clinical impacts of differences in their measurements on intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions. Methods Eighty eyes of 80 patients scheduled to undergo cataract surgery were examined with both biometers. The measurements made using each device were axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), lens thickness (LT), mean keratometry (MK), white-to-white distance (WTW), and pupil diameter (PD). Holladay 2 and SRK/T formulas were used to calculate IOL power. Differences in measurement between the two biometers were determined using the paired t-test. Agreement was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Results Mean patient age was 76.3±6.8 years (range 59–89). Using the Lenstar, AL and PD could not be measured in 12.5 and 5.25% of eyes, respectively, while IOLMaster 700 took all measurements in all eyes. The variables CCT, AQD, LT, and MK varied significantly between the two biometers. According to ICCs, correlation between measurements made with both devices was excellent except for WTW and PD. Using the SRK/T formula, IOL power prediction based on the data from the two devices were statistically different, but differences were not clinically significant. Conclusions No clinically relevant differences were detected between the biometers in terms of their measurements and IOL power predictions. Using the IOLMaster 700, it was easier to obtain biometric measurements in eyes with less transparent ocular media or longer AL.