龙胆科蔓龙胆属及其相关类群的系统学研究

本文回顾了龙胆科蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属、龙胆属狭蕊组和翼萼蔓属的研究历史，对这些类群的外部形态、花部解剖结构、染色体、花粉形态及胚胎学进行了研究，并结合已有的资料，探讨了这些类群的分类学问题。主要结论如下： 1．外部形态 蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属、龙胆属狭蕊组和龙胆属其他组之 间以及蔓龙胆属和翼萼蔓属之间在外部形态上均存在差异。 2．花部解剖结构 蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属、龙胆属狭蕊组和龙胆属其他组的花部解剖结构存在较多地相似之处，同时蔓龙胆属和双蝴蝶属的花被维管束和腺体比龙胆属狭蕊组和龙胆属其他组的特化。而翼萼蔓属的花部解剖结构与蔓龙胆属的差异较大，与扁蕾属的花部解剖结构较相似。 3．染色体 本文对蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属、龙胆属狭蕊组和翼萼蔓属的7种植物的染色体数目、基数和核型对称性作了研究，其中6种植物的染色体为首次报道，它们是：披针叶蔓龙胆C．delavayi、双蝴蝶T.chnense、峨眉双蝴蝶T．cordatum、锯齿龙胆 G．serra、毛脉龙胆G．souliei、和翼萼蔓P．volubilis。蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属和龙胆属狭蕊组的核型不对称性稍强于龙胆属其他组，但在染色体组成上十分相似。翼萼蔓属和蔓龙胆属的染色体差异较大，面与扁蕾属的染色体较相似。 4.花粉形态蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属、龙胆属狭蕊组和龙胆属其他组均具有球形或长球形、3孔沟、沟长而宽、外壁纹饰为条纹一无穿孔和条纹一穿孔的花粉类型。而翼萼蔓属的花粉为球形、纹饰为网状纹馋与蔓龙胆属不同，与扁蕾属的花粉较相似。 5．胚胎学 本文对披针叶蔓龙胆C，delavayi、双蝴蝶T．chinense、峨眉双蝴蝶T．cordatum、条纹龙胆G. striata和翼萼蔓P．volubilis作了较详细的胚胎学研究，这些类群在花药壁的分化和形成、胚珠和胎座类型、卵器中的助细胞和反足细胞、种皮以及胚发育等特征上存在差异，并且在胚胎学特征上各自拥有原始和进化的性状。蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属和龙胆属之间的胚胎学性状差异较大，龙胆属狭蕊组与双蝴蝶属的胚胎学性状较相似，而与蔓龙胆属和龙胆属其他组的差吴较大。翼萼蔓属的胚胎学性状与扁蕾属的较相似，而与蔓龙胆属的差异较大。 6．综合分析外部形态、花部解剖结构、染色体、花粉形态及胚胎学性状，结果表明，蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属、龙胆属狭蕊组和龙胆属其他组是亲缘关系十分相近的类群，在某些特征上已存在明显地演化极向，但在大多数特征上演化极向不明。蔓龙胆属和双蝴蝶属分别作为独立属处理较为合适，而且两属的亲缘关系很近。狭蕊组仍应放在龙胆属，蔓龙胆属比双蝴蝶属与龙胆属的亲缘关系更近一些。翼萼蔓属也应作为一独立属处理，而且该属可能与扁蕾属的亲缘关系较近，而与蔓龙胆属亲缘关系较远。 7．本文还讨论了蔓龙胆属、双蝴蝶属、龙胆属狭蕊组和翼萼蔓属的地理分布。

条纹龙胆的胚胎学研究(英文)

首次报道了条纹龙胆(Gentiana striata Maxim.) 的胚胎学特征, 研究结果用以讨论龙胆属狭蕊组(Gentiana Sect.Stenogyne) 的系统演化关系。主要研究结果如下: 花药四室; 药壁发育为双子叶型; 绒毡层细胞仅来源于初生壁细胞, 故绒毡层起源属单型起源, 细胞具单核,原位退化, 属腺质型绒毡层, 药隔处的绒毡层细胞经多次平周分裂形成2 层至多层的绒毡层细胞, 其余部位的绒毡层细胞仍为1 层细胞; 中层细胞1 层；在花药成熟时, 花药的表皮细胞和药室内壁均部分纤维状加厚且柱状伸长。小孢子母细胞减数分裂为同时型, 四分体的排列主要为四面体形；成熟花粉为32细胞型。子房为2心皮, 1室, 侧膜胎座。胚珠4列。薄珠心,单珠被, 珠心基部产生珠被原基, 进而形成珠被, 条纹龙胆仅有1 层珠被。珠被沿珠心向上生长并将珠心包围, 于胚珠顶部形成珠孔。胚珠在发育过程中, 整个胚珠的本体倒转, 而且珠柄继续生长并弯曲, 使珠孔与合点端的连线与珠柄垂直, 形成Hypertropous 胚珠。大孢子母细胞减数分裂形成的4 个大孢子呈直列式排列, 合点端的大孢子具功能。胚囊发育为蓼型。极核在受精前融合为次生核, 反足细胞3 个、多宿存。雄蕊先熟。珠孔受精。胚乳发育为核型。胚胎发育为茄型酸浆Ⅱ变型。通过比较龙胆属狭蕊组与龙胆属其它组和双蝴蝶属的胚胎学特征表明, 龙胆属狭蕊组在一些重要的胚胎学特征上与双蝴蝶属较相似, 而与龙胆属其它组存在较大差异, 故建议应将龙胆属狭蕊组从龙胆属中移出。

Metagentiana, a new genus of Gentianaceae

The evidence from cross morphology, floral anatomy, chromosomes, palynology, and embryology all indicates that sect. Stenogyne is discordant within the genus Gentiana and is as distinct from the other sections of Gentiana as are other genera, such as Tripterospermum and Crawfurdia. In light of these characters, sect. Stenogyne is removed from Gentiana and given generic rank as the new genus Metagentiana. It is more related to Tripterospermum and Crawfurdia than to Gentiana, though it is more primitive than the first two genera. Together with Tripterospermum and Crawfurdia the new genus forms a monophyletic group, which is the sister group to the genus Gentiana. Fourteen new combinations required at specific rank are proposed.

中国后生耳蕨组Sect. Metapolystichum 的分类学研究

本文以形态特征为主，并参考其它证据，将中国Sect. Metapolystichum分为2个亚组，8个系，共记载45种2变种，其中新分类群21种1变种，新分布1种，新组合1个，并有11个新异名。对每种载有文献和标本引证及简要特征，新种则记有拉丁描述，并对某些疑难种进行了讨论。本文对叶表皮细胞的解剖研究表明，中国Sect.Metapolystichum植物气孔基本类型有两种，即十字型四细胞型和轴极型。各种植物的叶表皮细胞形态特征都不尽相同，有一定的分类学意义。作者对孢子形态的研究表明，中国Sect. Metapolystichum植物孢子周壁纹饰可分为八类，即波状、皱波状、条纹状、脑纹状、假网状、穴状、网状和复网状；在44种2变种中，孢子周壁纹饰表现出43种不同的形态。这一研究为分类上解决一些疑难问题、组下分类及系统发育研究提供了重要依据。本文中至少23种植物的孢子形态属首次报道。本文还根据中国Sect. Metapolystichum植物形态、解剖和孢子特征，遵循分支系统学的理论，借以确定了本组植物27个性状的极性；应用最大同步法（略有改进），通过简约性分析，构建了中国Sect. Metapolystichum植物有根的Wagnet树。作者对中国Sect. Metapolystichum植物的植物地理学特征也进行了分析，讨论了本组植物地理分布特征、间断分布现象、特有现象、替代现象、植物区系成分等，并就中国Sect. Metapolystichum植物区系进行了初步分区。

中国蔷薇属芹叶组（Rosa Sect. Pimpinellifoliae DC. ex Ser.）的分类学研究

本研究通过我国CDBI、 KUN、PE、SZ等主要标本馆约3, 500份馆藏标本的研究和野外考察相结合，对我国蔷薇属（Rosa L.）芹叶组(Sect. pimpinellifoliae DC. ex Ser.）植物以及相关组的一些种进行了性状特征、形态和微形态的研究，对该组的一些种的形态特征描述进行了补充，同时给出详细的地理和海拔范围分布图。综合花粉以及种子（瘦果）形态的研究结果重新制订了分种检索表，同时，对该组一些形态相近容易混淆的种进行了对比研究，特别对一直存在争议的绢毛复合体（绢毛蔷薇R. sericea Lindl.和峨眉蔷薇R. omeiensis Rolfe）进行了大量宏观形态特征的研究，并用光学显微镜（LM）和扫描电镜(SEM)对二者的花粉及种子形态、微形态进行对比研究和分析，主要研究内容包括： 1. 芹叶组孢粉研究 对芹叶组的10个种及相关的4个组共17个种（18个样品）的植物花粉进行了光镜和扫描电镜观察和比较研究。研究结果表明：蔷薇属植物花粉粒大小为中等偏小，极轴长23.98[21.82(R. graciliflora Rehd. et Wils.)～29.18(R. tsinglingensis Pax. et Hoffm.)] μm，赤道轴长28.65[24.15（R. graciliflora）～34.70(R. davidii Crép.)] μm；花粉属辐射对称等极单花粉，花粉形态赤道面观呈球形到超长球形；极面观为三裂圆形或近圆形,三孔沟，孔缘加厚,具中部突起的桥状盖。花粉外壁纹饰为条纹状，光镜下形态特征相差不大；在电镜下外壁条纹和脊沟内穿孔的形状、大小和频度等特征，常具组至种水平上的可见变异，可作为组至种水平划分的依据。 根据花粉外壁条纹特征及穿孔形状和数目等特征，本研究将这些植物的花粉归为5个类型，并编制了分组检索表。同时，根据条纹状的清晰度，排列方式、条纹形状、穿孔大小及其频度等方面的差异，各有特点，对该组的10个种编制了分种检索表。 2. 芹叶组种子形态研究 应用光学显微镜和扫描电镜对我国蔷薇属芹叶组14个种及相关组5个组共36种植物的种子宏观形态及种皮微形态特征进行了观察研究。结果显示，蔷薇属种子形态多样,形状分别为肾形、卵形或锥形等；种子颜色以淡棕色、褐色以及土黄色为主；种子大小种间相差悬殊，相对体积为（长×宽×厚）36.66（4.79～114.47) mm3。光镜下，种子宏观形态特征具组内一致性，在扫描电镜下种子表面结构特征因种而异，其纹饰以网纹为主，可分为3种类型，即近平滑型、负网纹型和网纹型。研究结果表明，蔷薇属种子表面纹饰与地理分布关系不大,具有组及种内稳定性。其种子形态、大小、表而纹饰类型等特征可作为蔷薇属组及种水平上的分类依据。 结合蔷薇属花粉形态研究结果，得出蔷薇属种皮微形态特征与花粉外壁纹饰特征相吻合，在代表组及种的特征上具相关性的结论。同时根据种子形态、微形态结构特征的组间区别和种间差异编制了分组及芹叶组14个种的分种检索表。 3. 绢毛蔷薇复合体的研究 通过对大量标本的研究、野外观察以及扫描电镜对绢毛蔷薇复合体的花粉形态和种皮表面结构进行研究，通过对小叶、花粉及种子的形态定量分析结果支持Rowley (1959)的观点，将峨眉蔷薇处理为绢毛蔷薇的一个变种。 综上研究结果得出，蔷薇属植物的小叶片数目、花被基数以及花粉及种子形态等性状是较为稳定的，这些特征可很好的作为分类学依据。 The morphology, pollen exine sculpture and seed coat structure of the species of Rosa sect. Pimpinellifoliae and related sections were studied.About 3,500 herbarium specimens at CDBI, KUN, PE, and SZ were examined. Field work in Sichuan and Yunnan were conducted. Revisions of some species were carried out and a new key to species of sect. Pimpinellifoliae was proposed based on morphology, pollen exine sculpture and seed coat structure, Detailed morphological descriptions, geographical distributions and the altitudinal ranges of some taxa are given. The systematics of the species complex, the Rosa sericea complex (R. sericea Lindl. & R. omeiensis Rolfe), was emphasized. This thesis focused on the following three aspects: 1. Pollen morphology of Rosa sect. Pimpinellifoliae The pollen morphology of 18 samples representing 10 species of the Eurasian Rosa sect. Pimpinellifoliae and 7 additional species of related sections was investigated under LM and SEM. The pollen grains are monadic, actinomorphic, equipolar, medium-sized, spheroidal to perprolate in equatorial view, 3-lobed circular or semi-circular in polar view, crassimarginate, pontoperculate, and with striate exine sculpture. The striate sculpture varies among sections and species. The equatorial axis ranges from 17.97 μm (R. sikangensis) to 29.18 μm (R. tsinglingensis) with an average of 23.98 μm in length, while polar axis varies from 24.15 μm (R. gracilifolra) to 34.70 μm (R. davidii) with an average of 28.65 μm in length. The pollens can be divided into five types based on striate sculpture and a key to the sections sampled was proposed accordingly. The pollen morphology of species of sect. Pimpinellifoliae is more homogeneous and different from other sections sampled and did not support the two-series subdivisions in sect. Pimpinellifoliae. A key is also provided based on characers of pollen morphology among species in sect. Pimpinellifoliae. 2. Seed coat structure of Rosa sect. Pimpinellifoliae The seed coat structure of 39 samples representing 14 species of Rosa sect. Pimpinellifoliae and 12 additional species of related sections was investigated under LE and SEM. The seed relative volume (Length × width × thickness) ranges from 4.79 to 114.47 mm3 with an average of 36.66. mm3. The seeds are reniform, ovate or oblong in shape, with orange-brown, light brown or deep brown color. Seed coat sculpture was reticulate or striate-like reticulate. There was no difference in sculpture character of various speices under LM, while three types of seed coat sculpture were identified under SEM and a key to species based on the seed coat sculpture was provided. The three types of seed coat sculpture were nearly smooth, areolate and reticulate. The study of the seed coat sculpture of same species sampled from different populations showed that characters on the seed coat are stable, and thus the size, shape and seed coat sculpture can be used in species level identification. Interestingly, characters in the seed coat sculpture and the pollen morphology in sect. Pimpinellifoliae are consistent at in specific or sectional levels. A key to the 14 species sampled was given based on seed coat sculpture. 3. The study on Rosa sericea complex The Rosa sericea complex contains R. omeiensis and R. sericea. They are morphologically similar to one another and the systematic status of R. omeiensis has been controversial. In this study we examined large numbers of herbarium specimens of R. omeiensis and R. sericea and conducted field observations in the Hengduan Mts.. We also performed SEM study of pollen morphology and seed coat structure of R. omeiensis and R. sericea. We further carried out intensive morphometric study on the leaflet, pollen, and seed morphology. Our results showed that R. omeiensis should be sunk to be a variety of R. sericea, just as Rowley’s treatment in 1959. In conclusion, the features in the number of leaflet and petal, and the morphological character on pollen and seed are relatively stable. Therefore these characters are very useful in taxon delimition.