KNOCK DETECTION BY AUDIBLE, ACCELEROMETER, PRESSURE AND IONIC CURRENT METHODS.

This paper describes the ways which are used at the present time by the Ford Motor Company for the detection of knock. A description of the available methods is given, and their relative effectiveness is assessed by analysing data taken simultaneously by all of these methods. It is shown that no one technique has an overwhelming advantage, but that each technique has its individual merits and demerits.

KNOCK DETECTION ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCTION VEHICLES.

A method for the detection of knock using the sparking plug, and a system which allows the basic nature of the signal from the spark plug to be compared directly with that from an accelerometer are described. Results are presented for a range of engine speeds which highlight the problems and benefits of each sensing technique.

KNOCK DETECTION ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCTION VEHICLES.

A method for the detection of knock using the sparking plug, and a system which allows the basic nature of the signal from the spark plug to be compared directly with that from an accelerometer are described. Results are presented for a range of engine speeds which highlight the problems and benefits of each sensing technique.

Experience using MEMS-based accelerometers in dynamic testing

Measurement of acceleration in dynamic tests is carried out routinely, and in most cases, piezoelectric accelerometers are used at present. However, a new class of instruments based on MEMS technology have become available and are gaining use in many applications due to their small size, low mass and low-cost. This paper describes a centrifuge lateral spreading experiment in which MEMS and piezoelectric accelerometers were placed at similar depths. Good agreement was obtained when the instruments were located in dense sands, but significant differences were observed in loose, liquefiable soils. It was found that the performance of the piezoelectric accelerometer is poor at low frequency, and that the relative phase difference between the piezoelectric and MEMS accelerometer varies significantly at low frequency. © 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London.