38 resultados para Vehicle identification and detection system
Resumo:
Antibody orientation and its antigen binding efficiency at interface are of particular interest in many immunoassays and biosensor applications. In this paper, spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE), neutron reflection (NR), and dual polarization interferometry (DPI) have been used to investigate interfacial assembly of the antibody [mouse monoclonal anti-human prostate-specific antigen (anti-hPSA)] at the silicon oxide/water interface and subsequent antigen binding. It was found that the mass density of antibody adsorbed at the interface increased with solution concentration and adsorption time while the antigen binding efficiency showed a steady decline with increasing antibody amount at the interface over the concentration range studied. The amount of antigen bound to the interfacial immobilized antibody reached a maximum when the surface-adsorbed amount of antibody was around 1.5 mg/m(2). This phenomenon is well interpreted by the interfacial structural packing or crowding. NR revealed that the Y-shaped antibody laid flat on the interface at low surface mass density with a thickness around 40 Å, equivalent to the short axial length of the antibody molecule. The loose packing of the antibody within this range resulted in better antigen binding efficiency, while the subsequent increase of surface-adsorbed amount led to the crowding or overlapping of antibody fragments, hence reducing the antigen binding due to the steric hindrance. In situ studies of antigen binding by both NR and DPI demonstrated that the antigen inserted into the antibody layer rather than forming an additional layer on the top. Stability assaying revealed that the antibody immobilized at the silica surface remained stable and active over the monitoring period of 4 months. These results are useful in forming a general understanding of antibody interfacial behavior and particularly relevant to the control of their activity and stability in biosensor development.
Resumo:
A digital minicomputer has been interfaced with a scanning electron microscope, and programmed to control the excitations of the objective lens and the stigmator of the microscope. The electron beam is scanned by a digital scan generator and the digitised video signal is used for computations. To focus the microscope, a parameter related to the 'sharpness' of the image is maximised, and to set the stigmator, the directional information in the above- and below-focus images is used. | A digital minicomputer has been interfaced with a scanning electron microscope, and programmed to control the excitations of the objective lens and the stigmator of the microscope. The electron beam is scanned by a digital scan generator and the digitized video signal is used for computations. To focus the microscope, a parameter related to the 'sharpness' of the image is maximized, and to set the stigmator, the directional information in the above and below-focus images is used.