Le relativisme idéologique

Abstract: From a general standpoint, current thought is dominated by an ideological relativism which considers that truth depends on whom asserts a certain statement. This stance, related to Protagoras’ perspective, rejects the Enlightenment’s view, especially Kant’s way of thinking, viz. It rejects of all forms of authority, transcendent authority in particular. It also favors the conception of the subject developed by Sartre’s existentialism. However, relativism is the ultimate expression of skepticism which always reflects a painful rational relinquishment of the natural desire for truth. Relativism weakens reason and makes the arrival of ideological and political totalitarianism possible, which the 20th century suffered in its most tragic versions. In order to prevent its consequences and to restore reason’s legitimate confidence in wisdom, modern man ought to find the universal within him and his natural thirst for truth, and his transcendent origin. This demands recognizing and accepting humbly man’s condition as a creature, and his dependence on the Verb, who is Truth and Life.

Lereis, o Tántale en “Diálogos de los muertos” 7.2, análisis y traducción

Resumen: En Diálogos de los muertos 7 Menipo de Gádara intenta convencer a Tántalo de que su castigo, el tener sed en el Hades y no poder beber, es una mera ficción. Esta postura del gadarense se manifiesta claramente mediante el empleo del verbo ληρέω para describir el comportamiento de Tántalo (Dmort. 7.2). Lo que intentamos elucidar en el presente trabajo es si, desde la perspectiva de Menipo, dicha ficción se debe a una mentira intencional de Tántalo o a una enfermedad psíquica. De la interpretación que hagamos a este respecto dependerá la traducción del verbo ληρeω como ‘’decir tonterías’’ o ‘’delirar’’.