Sources of contention and the emerging reality concerning Qohelet's Carpe Diem advice

Abstract: When Qohelet declares “there is nothing new under the sun,” his own words are no exception. It has been known for a century now that not all of Qohelet’s material is original to his own genius, and the idea that Qohelet is directly dependent on a literary source(s) is standard fare. The hallmark example continues to be Siduri the alewife’s advice to Gilgamesh which displays remarkable correspondence with Ecclesiastes 9: 7-9. However, what may have been construed as an instance of clear literary dependency a century ago cannot be maintained in light of the data that continues to emerge from the ancient Near East. New sources have risen that contend with the Gilgamesh Epic, and there has yet to emerge a definitive victor. This paper calls into question the very idea that Qohelet was directly dependent on a literary precursor and joins with a few select voices both past and present in suggesting an alternate interpretation of the data.

Aspectos bioéticos del trasplante con donantes vivos

Resumen: El 4 de junio de 2010 se solicita al Comité de Bioética del Hospital Privado de Córdoba, Argentina, una consulta para que se analicen los aspectos éticos de un trasplante pulmonar lobar bilateral, con donante vivo relacionado para dos hermanas gemelas de 17 años con diagnóstico de fibrosis quística (Acta 172). Este caso nos permite revisar dos ejes esenciales de la constitución de la Bioética como son las funciones y actuación de los comités de Bioética en las instituciones hospitalarias, y la licitud de los trasplantes de órganos cuando hay donantes vivos. Se justificará la actuación del Comité de Bioética en este caso, analizando los puntos a tener en cuenta y los recaudos y recomendaciones que habrían de considerarse frente a esta situación planteada.