El principio energía

Resumen: El autor declara que la concepción de la energía, tal como ha arribado a nuestro tiempo, tiene sus orígenes en la Antigua Grecia , pero la noción contemporánea de energía incluye muchas dificultades como para ser aceptada sin crítica . De hecho, los físicos y filósofos discrepan con sus alcances en el mundo natural, y, además, con su naturaleza entitativa. En este artículo se discuten las opiniones de varios fisicomatemáticos y filósofos. No obstante, e n la conclusión final se expresa la necesidad de retornar a la teoría aristotélico-tomista que identifica la energía con el acto de ser, ya de cada cosa mundana, ya de las substancias separadas, porque el acto propio de Dios, que es su misma esencia, no es nada diferente de la energía concebida como el acto puro de la metafísica de Aristóteles y de Santo Tomás de Aquino.

Biblical evidence from Obadiah and Psalm 137 for an Edomite treaty betrayal of Judah in the sixth century B.C.E.

Abstract: Focusing on Obadiah and Psalm 137, this article provides biblical evidence for an Edomite treaty betrayal of Judah during the Babylonian crisis ca. 588–586 B.C.E. After setting a context that includes the use of treaties in the ancient Near East to establish expectations for political relationships and the likelihood that Edom could operate as a political entity in the Judahite Negev during the Babylonian assault, this article demonstrates that Obadiah’s poetics include a density of inverted form and content (a reversal motif) pointing to treaty betrayal. Obadiah’s modifications of Jeremiah 49, a text with close thematic and terminological parallels, evidence an Edomite treaty betrayal of Judah. Moreover, the study shows that Obadiah is replete with treaty allusions. A study of Psalm 137 in comparison with Aramaic treaty texts from Sefire reveals that this difficult psalm also evidences a treaty betrayal by Edom and includes elements appropriate for treaty curses. The article closes with a discussion of piecemeal data from a few other biblical texts, a criticism of the view that Edom was innocent during the Babylonian crisis, and a suggestion that this treaty betrayal may have contributed to the production of some anti-Edom biblical material.