Can the change in the composition of the US GDP explain the Great Moderation? A test via oil price shocks

The paper investigates whether the growing GDP share of the services sector can contribute to explain the great moderation in the US. We identify and analyze three oil price shocks and use a SVAR analysis to measure their economic impact on the US economy at both the aggregate and the sectoral level. We find mixed support for the explanation of the great moderation in terms of shrinking oil shock volatilities and observe that increases (decreases) in oil shock volatilities are contrasted by a weakening (strengthening) in their transmission mechanism. Across sectors, services are the least affected by any oil shock. As the contribution of services to the GDP volatility increases over time, we conclude that a composition effect contributed to moderate the conditional volatility to oil shocks of the US GDP.

Semantic change

[ES] En este trabajo se define el cambio semántico, se analizan las causas de que se produzca y se especifican sus tipos en el griego antiguo.

Syntactic change

[ES] En este trabajo se define el cambio sintáctico, se analizan los factores que lo causan o facilitan y se estudian sus tipos principales en griego antiguo.

What happened during the climate change negotiations in Copenhagen 2009?

4 p.

Warning to navigators: IPCC report on climate change mitigation

6 p.

Effects of Climate Change on the European Nuclear Power Sector

4 p.

Optimal Investment in Energy Efficiency under Uncertainty

41 p.

The Health Impacts of Climate Change: A Study of Cholera in Tanzania

27 p.

Impacts of Climate Change on European Critical Infrastructures: The Case of the Power Sector

23 p.

The Health Effects of Climate Change: A Survey of Recent Quantitative Research

44 p.

Analysis and Use of Information and Communication Tools in Economics of Climate Change

16 p.

International Support of Climate Change Policies in Developing Countries: Strategic, Moral and Fairness Aspects

33 p.

The Role of Regions in Climate Change Policy

28 p.

Climate Change, Responsibilities, and Defeatism and Complacency

16 p.

Climate Change and Knowledge Communities

19 p.